Stasis index from hemodynamic analysis using quantitative DSA correlates with hemorrhage of supratentorial arteriovenous malformation: a cross-sectional study

医学 血流动力学 单变量分析 数字减影血管造影 动静脉畸形 接收机工作特性 放射科 逻辑回归 心脏病学 多元分析 内科学 血管造影 核医学
作者
Te-Ming Lin,Huai Yang,Cheng‐Chia Lee,Hsiu Mei Wu,Yong Sin Hu,Chao Luo,Wan Yuo Guo,Yi Hsuan Kao,Wen Yuh Chung,Chung‐Jung Lin
出处
期刊:Journal of Neurosurgery [American Association of Neurological Surgeons]
卷期号:132 (5): 1574-1582 被引量:55
标识
DOI:10.3171/2019.1.jns183386
摘要

OBJECTIVE Assessments of hemorrhage risk based on angioarchitecture have yielded inconsistent results, and quantitative hemodynamic studies have been limited to small numbers of patients. The authors examined whether cerebral hemodynamic analysis using quantitative digital subtraction angiography (QDSA) can outperform conventional DSA angioarchitecture analysis in evaluating the risk of hemorrhage associated with supratentorial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed by retrospectively reviewing adult supratentorial AVM patients who had undergone both DSA and MRI studies between 2011 and 2017. Angioarchitecture characteristics, DSA parameters, age, sex, and nidus volume were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and QDSA software analysis was performed on DSA images. Based on the QDSA analysis, a stasis index, defined as the inflow gradient divided by the absolute value of the outflow gradient, was determined. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare diagnostic performances of conventional DSA angioarchitecture analysis and analysis using hemodynamic parameters based on QDSA. RESULTS A total of 119 supratentorial AVM patients were included. After adjustment for age at diagnosis, sex, and nidus volume, the exclusive deep venous drainage (p < 0.01), observed through conventional angioarchitecture examination using DSA, and the stasis index of the most dominant drainage vein (p = 0.02), measured with QDSA hemodynamic analysis, were independent risk factors for hemorrhage. The areas under the ROC curves for the conventional DSA method (0.75) and QDSA hemodynamics analysis (0.73) were similar. A venous stasis index greater than 2.18 discriminated the hemorrhage group with a sensitivity of 52.6% and a specificity of 81.5%. CONCLUSIONS In QDSA, a higher stasis index of the most dominant drainage vein is an objective warning sign associated with supratentorial AVM rupture. Risk assessments of AVMs using QDSA and conventional DSA angioarchitecture were equivalent. Because QDSA is a complementary noninvasive approach without extra radiation or contrast media, comprehensive hemorrhagic risk assessment of cerebral AVMs should include both DSA angioarchitecture and QDSA analyses.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
机灵雅柏完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
初景应助003采纳,获得20
刚刚
2秒前
清清完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
YJDlXX完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
4秒前
FashionBoy应助wang采纳,获得10
4秒前
彭于晏应助乐融融采纳,获得10
4秒前
求求科研发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
suye发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Dengolia完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
昊行天下完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
史淼荷发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
玉潭湖水怪完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
科研通AI6.1应助栗子猿采纳,获得10
11秒前
piggyfly完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
顾良完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
SciGPT应助Min采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
科研啦发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
aa121599发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
张进萍完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
沙心发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
好好睡觉完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
fancy应助史淼荷采纳,获得20
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
HFH应助宇宙粉红闪电采纳,获得10
20秒前
小马甲应助vivy采纳,获得10
22秒前
乐乐应助莹WIN采纳,获得10
23秒前
麦兜发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
yu完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
情怀应助zzzkyt采纳,获得10
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Handbook of Optical Systems,Volume 6:Advanced Physical Optics 666
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6514760
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8308155
关于积分的说明 17754713
捐赠科研通 5616566
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2924722
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1901757
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1763118