时间轴
工程设计过程
任务(项目管理)
多样性(控制论)
工程教育
论证(复杂分析)
质量(理念)
工程类
计算机科学
数学教育
工程管理
心理学
系统工程
人工智能
机械工程
生物化学
化学
哲学
认识论
考古
历史
作者
Cynthia J. Atman,Robin Adams,Monica Cardella,Jennifer Turns,Susan Mosborg,Jason J. Saleem
标识
DOI:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x
摘要
Abstract In this paper we report on an in‐depth study of engineering design processes. Specifically, we extend our previous research on engineering student design processes to compare the design behavior of students and expert engineers. Nineteen experts from a variety of engineering disciplines and industries each designed a playground in a lab setting, and gave verbal reports of their thoughts during the design task. Measures of their design processes and solution quality were compared to pre‐existing data from 26 freshmen and 24 seniors. The experts spent significantly more time on the task overall and in each stage of engineering design, including significantly more time problem scoping. The experts also gathered significantly more information covering more categories. Results support the argument that problem scoping and information gathering are major differences between advanced engineers and students, and important competencies for engineering students to develop. Timeline representations of the expert designers' processes illustrate characteristic distinctions we found and may help students gain insights into their own design processes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI