医学
血运重建
心脏病学
内科学
冠状动脉疾病
心肌血运重建术
作者
Katsuhiro Hosoyama,Kay Maeda,Yoshikatsu Saiki
出处
期刊:Current Opinion in Cardiology
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2021-09-03
卷期号:36 (6): 748-754
标识
DOI:10.1097/hco.0000000000000920
摘要
Coronary revascularization is known to be an excellent treatment for coronary artery disease. However, whether incomplete myocardial revascularization compromises long-term outcomes, as compared to complete revascularization (CR), remains contentious. Herein, we review the concept of and evidence on CR/incomplete revascularization (ICR) and discuss future perspectives.When possible, achieving CR in coronary artery bypass grafting is desirable; nonetheless, ICR is also a reasonable option to balance the therapeutic benefits against the risks.Although angiography-based assessment currently remains the standard of care, fractional flow reserve guidance may reduce the number of lesions requiring revascularization, which may be helpful for an appropriate surgical revascularization strategy. In particular, utilizing this approach may refine hybrid revascularization procedures, especially among high-risk patients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI