利用
瓶颈
命题
考试(生物学)
工作(物理)
科学发现
工程伦理学
经济
计算机科学
工程类
心理学
认识论
认知科学
机械工程
古生物学
哲学
运营管理
计算机安全
生物
出处
期刊:Organization Science
[Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences]
日期:2018-06-20
卷期号:29 (5): 818-836
被引量:38
标识
DOI:10.1287/orsc.2018.1206
摘要
Inventors cannot exploit new scientific discoveries if they do not pay attention to them. However, allocating attention to science is difficult because the scientific literature is complex, vast, fast-changing, and often unreliable. Inventors are therefore likely to rely on informational cues when screening new publications. I posit that inventors pay significantly less attention to discoveries “made in academia” than to those “made in industry” because they believe that the work of academic scientists will be less useful to them. I test this proposition by examining inventors’ patent references to the scientific literature in the case of simultaneous discoveries made by at least one team based in academia and another based in industry. I find that inventors are 23% less likely to cite the academic paper than its “twin” from industry. My results highlight the importance of inventors’ attention as a previously underexplored bottleneck shaping the translation of science into new technologies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI