Disagreement in Pass Rates Between Strength and Performance Tests in Patients Recovering From Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

前交叉韧带重建术 Hop(电信) 医学 前交叉韧带 口腔正畸科 康复 物理疗法 物理医学与康复 外科 计算机网络 计算机科学
作者
Xavier D. Thompson,Amelia S. Bruce Leicht,Mandeep Kaur,David R. Diduch,Stephen F. Brockmeier,Mark D. Miller,F. Winston Gwathmey,Brian C. Werner,Joseph M. Hart
出处
期刊:American Journal of Sports Medicine [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:50 (8): 2111-2118 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1177/03635465221097712
摘要

Performance on strength and functional tests is often used to guide postoperative rehabilitation progress and return to activity decisions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Clinicians may have difficulty in determining which criteria to follow if there is disagreement in performance outcomes among the tests.The purpose of this study was to compare pass rates between strength tests and single-leg hop (SLHOP) tests among men and women and between patients with lower and higher preinjury activity levels recovering from ACLR. We hypothesized that pass rates would be nonuniformly distributed among test types, sex, and activity level and that more participants would pass hop tests than strength tests.Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.A total of 299 participants (146 men; 153 women)-at a mean of 6.8 ± 1.4 months after primary, unilateral, and uncomplicated ACLR (mean age, 23 ± 9.7 years; mean height, 172 ± 10.5 cm; mean mass, 75.8 ± 18.4 kg)-completed testing. Quadri.tif strength was evaluated using peak torque during isokinetic knee extension at 90 deg/s and 180 deg/s. Jump distance during the SLHOP and triple hop tests was measured (in cm). Strength and hop test measures were evaluated based on the limb symmetry index ((LSI) = (ACLR / contralateral side) × 100). We operationally defined "pass" as >90% on the LSI.Pass rates were nonuniformly distributed between isokinetic knee extension at 90 deg/s and the SLHOP test (χ2 = 18.64; P < .001). Disagreements between isokinetic testing at 90 deg/s and the SLHOP test occurred in 36.5% (109/299) of the participants. Among those who failed strength testing and passed hop testing, a greater portion reported higher activity levels before their injury (χ2 = 6.90; P = .01); however, there was no difference in pass rates between men and women. Similar patterns of disagreement were observed between all strength test and hop test outcomes.ACLR patients with higher activity levels may be more likely to pass hop testing despite failing quadri.tif strength testing. This may be an indicator of movement compensations to achieve jump symmetry in the presence of quadri.tif weakness.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
tangzhidi发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
蓝色完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
不养折耳猫完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
Calvin发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
丰富的冰棍完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Jasper应助狗东西采纳,获得10
5秒前
可爱猫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
KEKE发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
慕青应助Penn采纳,获得10
7秒前
多多发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
陈冰发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
酷波er应助默listening采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
LabRat完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Nakyseo完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
一花一叶完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
polarisier发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
维生素完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
夏至未至完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
狗东西完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
gejinxin完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
15秒前
LB发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
隐形曼青应助无情的哑铃采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
奥氏完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
qhk发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
浮游应助Penn采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 400
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
New directions for experimental lessons in science teaching: Myth, Mystery, Necessity? by Emily K. da Silva Cunha Souto (Author), Flávia Lins Silva (Author) 333
Scientific experimentation in the classroom: Comparison between genetic-Socratic-exemplary teaching and workshop teaching by Ingrid Hofer (Author) 333
Programming for Chemical Engineers Using C, C++, and MATLAB 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6719761
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8456665
关于积分的说明 18053973
捐赠科研通 5970994
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2995771
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1971806
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1925048