医学
甲状腺结节
结核(地质)
危险系数
置信区间
回顾性队列研究
甲状腺
外科
放射科
核医学
内科学
古生物学
生物
作者
Stella Bernardi,Valentina Rosolen,Fabio Barbone,Stefano Borgato,Maurilio Deandrea,Pierpaolo De Feo,Laura Fugazzola,Giovanni Gambelunghe,Roberto Negro,S. E. Oleandri,Giampaolo Papi,Enrico Papini,Francesca Retta,Ruth Rossetto,Daniela Sansone,Giuseppe Serra,Luca Maria Sconfienza,Luigi Solbiati,Stefano Spiezia,Fulvio Stacul,Giovanni Mauri
出处
期刊:Thyroid
[Mary Ann Liebert]
日期:2024-03-01
卷期号:34 (3): 360-370
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1089/thy.2023.0501
摘要
Background: Thermal ablation (TA) is an established therapeutic option alternative to surgery in patients with solid benign thyroid nodules causing local symptoms. However, a variable part of thyroid nodules remain viable after these nonsurgical treatments, and as many as 15% of nodules treated with TA may require a second treatment over time. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of TA re-treatment on symptomatic benign thyroid nodules where the volume decreased by <50% after the first procedure ( = technique inefficacy). Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent re-treatment with TA for benign thyroid nodules, whose volume decreased by <50% after initial treatment. The primary aim was to evaluate volume and volume reduction ratio (VRR) over time and compare the 6- and 12-month VRR after first versus second treatment. The secondary aim was to identify protective or risk factors for technique inefficacy, regrowth, and further treatments, expressed as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence interval [CI], after adjustment for sex, age, nodule volume, structure and function, nodule regrowth or symptom relapse, technique used and if the same technique was used for the first and second TA and time between them. Results: We included 135 patients. Re-treatment led to VRR of 50% and 52.2% after 6 and 12 months. VRR after re-treatment was greater than after first treatment in small and medium size nodules (<30 mL), while there were no differences for large nodules (>30 mL). After re-treatment technique inefficacy rate was 51.9%, regrowth rate was 12.6%, and further treatment rate was 15.6%. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was protective toward technique inefficacy (HR = 0.40 [CI 0.24–0.65]) and need of further treatments (HR = 0.30 [CI 0.12–0.76]). Large nodule volume (>30 mL) was associated with increased risk of re-treatment (HR = 4.52 [CI 1.38–14.82]). Conclusions: This is the first study evaluating the outcomes of re-treatment on symptomatic benign thyroid nodules with a VRR <50% after the initial TA treatment. Best results were seen in small and medium nodules (<30 mL) and after RFA. Prospective confirmatory studies are needed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI