International Consensus Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock

医学 败血症 协商一致会议 感染性休克 重症监护医学 严重败血症 梅德林 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Luregn J. Schlapbach,R. Scott Watson,Lauren R. Sorce,Andrew C. Argent,Kusum Menon,Mark W. Hall,Samuel Akech,David J. Albers,Elizabeth R. Alpern,Fran Balamuth,Melania M. Bembea,Paolo Biban,Enitan D. Carrol,Kathleen Chiotos,Mohammod Jobayer Chisti,Peter DeWitt,Idris Evans,Cláudio Flauzino de Oliveira,Christopher M. Horvat,David Inwald
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:331 (8): 665-665 被引量:153
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.0179
摘要

Importance Sepsis is a leading cause of death among children worldwide. Current pediatric-specific criteria for sepsis were published in 2005 based on expert opinion. In 2016, the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) defined sepsis as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, but it excluded children. Objective To update and evaluate criteria for sepsis and septic shock in children. Evidence Review The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) convened a task force of 35 pediatric experts in critical care, emergency medicine, infectious diseases, general pediatrics, nursing, public health, and neonatology from 6 continents. Using evidence from an international survey, systematic review and meta-analysis, and a new organ dysfunction score developed based on more than 3 million electronic health record encounters from 10 sites on 4 continents, a modified Delphi consensus process was employed to develop criteria. Findings Based on survey data, most pediatric clinicians used sepsis to refer to infection with life-threatening organ dysfunction, which differed from prior pediatric sepsis criteria that used systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, which have poor predictive properties, and included the redundant term, severe sepsis . The SCCM task force recommends that sepsis in children be identified by a Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 points in children with suspected infection, which indicates potentially life-threatening dysfunction of the respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and/or neurological systems. Children with a Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 points had in-hospital mortality of 7.1% in higher-resource settings and 28.5% in lower-resource settings, more than 8 times that of children with suspected infection not meeting these criteria. Mortality was higher in children who had organ dysfunction in at least 1 of 4—respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and/or neurological—organ systems that was not the primary site of infection. Septic shock was defined as children with sepsis who had cardiovascular dysfunction, indicated by at least 1 cardiovascular point in the Phoenix Sepsis Score, which included severe hypotension for age, blood lactate exceeding 5 mmol/L, or need for vasoactive medication. Children with septic shock had an in-hospital mortality rate of 10.8% and 33.5% in higher- and lower-resource settings, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance The Phoenix sepsis criteria for sepsis and septic shock in children were derived and validated by the international SCCM Pediatric Sepsis Definition Task Force using a large international database and survey, systematic review and meta-analysis, and modified Delphi consensus approach. A Phoenix Sepsis Score of at least 2 identified potentially life-threatening organ dysfunction in children younger than 18 years with infection, and its use has the potential to improve clinical care, epidemiological assessment, and research in pediatric sepsis and septic shock around the world.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研民工完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
浅斟低唱发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
迷路伊完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
阿卡宁完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
调皮的达发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
yeah完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
coco完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
阿废完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
hhhhh完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
笑点低的钥匙完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
ablewzmsci发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
blUe完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
泯珉完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
陈丽君小弟完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
安婷fly完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
无有完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
littlestone完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
激动的xx完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
鼠鼠完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
高大草莓完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
coco完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
小斌完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
Jaylou完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
复杂的听白完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Owen应助祖寻菡采纳,获得10
11秒前
MM完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
fire_tu完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
xinzhongchen1完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
不安的元霜完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
An Annotated Checklist of Dinosaur Species by Continent 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3661303
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3222367
关于积分的说明 9745047
捐赠科研通 2931980
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1605350
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 757854
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 734569