医学
改良兰金量表
蛛网膜下腔出血
背景(考古学)
外科
回顾性队列研究
支架
栓塞
冲程(发动机)
动脉瘤
缺血性中风
内科学
缺血
机械工程
古生物学
工程类
生物
作者
Simin Wang,Tongyu Zhang,Lei Du,Peng Hu,Ming Ye,Liyong Sun,Tao Hong,Guilin Li,Zhang Pen,H. Zhang,Chuan He
标识
DOI:10.1177/15910199231219212
摘要
Background Although stent-assisted coiling embolization (SAC) has been associated with a higher risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications, the use of SAC continues to rise for treating ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs). This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the context of RIAs. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis at a single center, involving patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) between May 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups: the SAC group and the non-SAC (NSC) group. Patients in the SAC group received DAPT. We compared modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, along with hemorrhagic and ischemic complications, between the two groups to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DAPT for SAC. Results The study included a total of 541 patients, of whom 38 (7.0%) experienced hemorrhagic complications and 48 (8.9%) developed ischemic complications. Additionally, 99 (18.3%) and 84 (15.5%) had poor clinical outcomes at discharge and 6 months, respectively. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups. Our analysis revealed that aneurysm location in the posterior circulation was a significant risk factor for an unfavorable prognosis when antiplatelet drugs were used following SAC ( p = 0.025). Conclusions Administering antiplatelet drugs after SAC for RIAs has demonstrated both safety and effectiveness. However, caution should be exercised when considering this treatment strategy for RIAs located in the posterior circulation due to the potentially elevated risk.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI