亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI2S应助houshyari采纳,获得10
26秒前
顾矜应助001采纳,获得10
31秒前
科研通AI2S应助Wei采纳,获得10
34秒前
平平无奇完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
40秒前
Tzzl0226发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
任性雪糕完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
zhaodan完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
guyuzheng完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Tzzl0226发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
爱听歌谷蓝完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Wei发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
隐形曼青应助文艺雪巧采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
魔幻的芳完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
文艺雪巧发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
花陵完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
柠橙发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
悲凉的忆南完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
缥缈发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
lx840518完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
陈旧完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
orixero应助yaonuliwa采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Tzzl0226发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
msk完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
欣欣子完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Lucas应助thousandlong采纳,获得10
1分钟前
诌小小完成签到 ,获得积分20
1分钟前
yxl完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
可耐的盈完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
李健应助柠橙采纳,获得10
1分钟前
thousandlong发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
Free parameter models in liquid scintillation counting 1000
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
The Organic Chemistry of Biological Pathways Second Edition 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6306754
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8123063
关于积分的说明 17014284
捐赠科研通 5365035
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2849273
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1826911
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1680244