The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
十四完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
汉堡包应助小贩采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
zhy完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
Cosmo_Caramel发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
athena完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
仲夏二十完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
柒月发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Yuyu完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
Do神完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
碳烤小肥羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
小左完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Dr_zs发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
江吉完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
小肥完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
hx完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
lboto发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
倩倩子发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
甜美梦槐发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
刺猬完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
沁逍遥发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
19秒前
ankh完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
zhenhao完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
Owen应助自觉的日记本采纳,获得10
21秒前
sxiao18完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
汉堡包应助倩倩子采纳,获得10
22秒前
劳伦斯完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
咖啡完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
简单应助气球采纳,获得20
24秒前
科研通AI2S应助小飞飞采纳,获得10
24秒前
科研通AI6.1应助Dr_zs采纳,获得10
26秒前
高分求助中
液晶指向矢仿真分析数据集 8888
GL 2 A method for assessing the in-place cleanability of food processing equipment, Fourth Edition, December 2023 3000
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 1000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Advanced Memory Technology 500
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
Writing Systems 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6863856
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8566753
关于积分的说明 18216098
捐赠科研通 6231884
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3048584
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2049853
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2026293