The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ZM完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
ddd完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
和谐的万仇完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
科研通AI6.4应助JLL丽丽采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
地之衣兮完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
萝卜家大小姐完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
含蓄戾完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Amy完成签到,获得积分0
5秒前
sandra433发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
高兴白山完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
海豚完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
果汁完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
王都对完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
凌轩完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
海洋球完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
动听初雪发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
现实的幻露完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
猫尔儿完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Mr_chen发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
aafrr完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
hetao286完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
神奇五子棋完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
lbx完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
读Paper完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
NicKlouse完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
望向天空的鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
sb完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
丁丁当当发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
matt完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
啊Q完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
窦函完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
CMC完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
liuyue完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
星辰完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 2500
Atlas of Aligner Treatment and Planning A Case-Based Approach 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
丝光沸石活性位点定向调控及其二甲醚羰基化性能研究 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7433014
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9034736
关于积分的说明 19246948
捐赠科研通 7059242
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3236651
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2400260
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2219863