The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
wdy111应助xiaoguai采纳,获得20
刚刚
dachengzi完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
丘比特应助含蓄心锁采纳,获得10
刚刚
许方恺发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
cr发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
plan发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
陆柯川完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
包容可仁发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Xbax发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
SciGPT应助莫西莫西采纳,获得10
4秒前
与月同行完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
ff完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
bkagyin应助summer采纳,获得10
6秒前
瘦瘦依白应助kingwhitewing采纳,获得10
6秒前
一把过完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Ezio_sunhao完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
热心烙完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
阿泽完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
wwww完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
YixiaoWang发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
cr完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
威武鸽子完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
包容可仁完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
拼搏绿柳完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
开心的紫烟完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
wdy111应助淡漠采纳,获得20
12秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 330
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der linguistischen Forschung 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3986722
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3529207
关于积分的说明 11243810
捐赠科研通 3267638
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1803822
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 881207
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 808582