亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
6秒前
7秒前
知悉发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
三岁应助ceeray23采纳,获得20
20秒前
33秒前
oleskarabach发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
zly完成签到 ,获得积分0
35秒前
Nilnael发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
浮游应助ceeray23采纳,获得20
38秒前
HaCat完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
43秒前
44秒前
采薇发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
yuan完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
小蘑菇应助jing采纳,获得10
1分钟前
搜集达人应助Luke采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
jing发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Demi_Ming完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
程小柒完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Demi_Ming关注了科研通微信公众号
1分钟前
烟花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
坚强的秋白完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
xiawanren00完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
采薇发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
无极微光应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
4分钟前
任性云朵完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
大模型应助jing采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
奋斗一刀完成签到,获得积分20
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
jing发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
高分求助中
From Victimization to Aggression 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
化妆品原料学 1000
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
小学科学课程与教学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5644846
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4765929
关于积分的说明 15025735
捐赠科研通 4803180
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2568067
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1525533
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1485079