The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
loquatautumn完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
简单的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
KamilahKupps完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
liu完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
吴谷杂粮完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
今天开心吗完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
qiancib202完成签到,获得积分0
31秒前
Orange的应助被维时采纳,获得10
35秒前
俭朴的藏今完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
37秒前
LJJ完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
fdpb完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
gxzsdf完成签到 ,获得积分0
47秒前
49秒前
Richard完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
维时发布了新的文献求助10
54秒前
55秒前
zl完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
aaaaa888888888完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
_Charmo发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
海洋球完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
学习完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
gfsuen完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
维时发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
GingerF的应助被殷勤的紫槐采纳,获得800
1分钟前
1分钟前
Sherry完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
唐唐完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Max完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
纯真完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
你好完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
rockyshi完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI6.4的应助被你好采纳,获得30
1分钟前
李爱国的应助被sfwrbh采纳,获得10
1分钟前
天天完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
汪洋慧完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
体贴雪萍完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
针真滴完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
IEC 61400-27-1:2020 1000
Spec 401: Standards for Jet Fuel Facility and Equipment Commissioning and Flushing at Airports, 2026.1 (Original Issue) 1000
Spec 103: Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports, Revision 2026.1 1000
5th World Conference on Detergents: Reinventing the Industry : Opportunities and Challenges 500
Erzählte Gnade 500
Butadiene hydroxytelechelic oligomers PBHT 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8103015
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9512989
关于积分的说明 21483942
捐赠科研通 7679258
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3409063
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2536830
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2449027