The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
mzm发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
77发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
彩色的弼完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
顺利的莺完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
bkagyin应助内向的问凝采纳,获得10
4秒前
6秒前
cxr发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
谨慎热狗完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
领导范儿应助vvvvvvv采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
yunxiao完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
吹又生完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
aaaa应助俊逸海豚采纳,获得10
8秒前
英姑应助RYS采纳,获得10
9秒前
小二郎应助ydq采纳,获得10
10秒前
12秒前
6666666666666666完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
彭于晏应助綦菽采纳,获得30
13秒前
hhhwxi发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
稳重的傲芙完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
allright完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
15秒前
Kao应助卡洛采纳,获得10
15秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
Mary应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
v0id应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 5000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7492333
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9084157
关于积分的说明 19373247
捐赠科研通 7104810
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3249345
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2418877
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2234904