The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zhao完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
铁盒的钥匙完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
YZ完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
刚刚
言诚开完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
周小篆完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
真的很哇塞完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
666完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
1234@完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
KK完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
zpc完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
luozejun完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
kori完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
benny279完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
董JIA完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
栗子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
妍Y完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
yu完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
VVTTWW完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
Athos_1992发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Atari完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
太阳能完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
mxr完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Lzh完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
蘑菇完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
清欢度完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
背后正豪完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
开心的zzz完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
袁琴完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
hhh完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
关你peace完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
有魅力老太完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
予秋发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
醉熏的皓轩完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
xyr完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
zzmole完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Johann完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
念槿的应助被精明寒松采纳,获得20
19秒前
下里巴人完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Особенности технологий и методов информационно-психологических войн СССР с Великобританией и США в период 1939-1953 гг 1000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Entre Praga y Madrid : los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 600
A REVIEW OF THE V-22 DYNAMICS VALIDATION PROGRAM 600
Les Mots du discours 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8123155
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9527089
关于积分的说明 21564279
捐赠科研通 7702692
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3415844
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2541698
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2456404