已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
文艺问柳完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
iamxx_发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
共享精神应助Qin采纳,获得10
2秒前
雷EX1完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
风清扬发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
迷途应助龙卷风飞飞飞采纳,获得10
7秒前
积心上岸完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
cheng关注了科研通微信公众号
8秒前
科研财鸟完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
科研通AI6.4应助岸然采纳,获得30
12秒前
传奇3应助Sc1ivez采纳,获得10
12秒前
null应助Peng0514采纳,获得10
13秒前
pacify完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
慕青应助哎哟我去采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
友好盼波发布了新的文献求助50
21秒前
风清扬发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
SciGPT应助xhsz1111采纳,获得10
27秒前
英俊的铭应助小易采纳,获得10
27秒前
Heuoo发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
28秒前
拥抱完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
Rimbaud完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
BJUTyang应助Hoshieko采纳,获得10
30秒前
30秒前
31秒前
32秒前
33秒前
Sc1ivez发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
英姑应助小牛采纳,获得10
33秒前
勤劳盼易发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
36秒前
36秒前
36秒前
36秒前
yu发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
37秒前
37秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Physiologic specialization in Peronospora manshurica 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7777581
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9318485
关于积分的说明 20364575
捐赠科研通 7364543
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3318952
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2466621
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2334202