The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zhenghua完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
曾紫君完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
NexusExplorer的应助被邹邹采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
请叫我女侠完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
ding的应助被不想读书采纳,获得10
2秒前
羊毛发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
平淡的碧灵完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
吴彦祖发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被xkey采纳,获得10
5秒前
桐桐的应助被白白采纳,获得10
5秒前
bioli完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
姚咚咚啊发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
zk092988完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
章鱼完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
鸳鸯的应助被hu采纳,获得30
7秒前
细心黎昕完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
33完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
娜娜子欧发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
Hello的应助被须尽欢采纳,获得30
9秒前
10秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被背包客采纳,获得10
10秒前
Jackie完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
111111完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
邹邹发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
sfdg完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
乐乐的应助被六月采纳,获得10
14秒前
斯文败类的应助被1933644015采纳,获得20
14秒前
凌风子完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
小木子发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被30采纳,获得10
16秒前
星辰大海的应助被小白采纳,获得10
16秒前
游帅发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Karry完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
汉堡包的应助被秋分前采纳,获得10
19秒前
badada完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
漂亮的雁露完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aspects of Post-SPE Phonology 2000
Nanocomposite Removal of Pesticides from Wastewater 1000
Practical Manual of Forensic Psychophysiology: Methodology, Execution, and Fields of Application 800
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Final Report for the 2-D Test of Model 901 Rotor and Wing Airfoils (BSWT 592) 528
Berberine regulates the TLR4 signaling pathway to suppress hypoxia-induced proliferation and migration of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells 520
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 心理学 人工智能 细胞生物学 光电子学 无机化学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7908006
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9411715
关于积分的说明 20894758
捐赠科研通 7508224
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3362062
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2499922
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2392272