亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
建议保存本图,每天支付宝扫一扫(相册选取)领红包
实时播报
天天快乐应助tdtk采纳,获得10
刚刚
mdomse2109发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
李雅琳完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
上官若男应助qlh采纳,获得10
5秒前
开放素完成签到 ,获得积分0
9秒前
WuFen完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
22秒前
24秒前
傅家庆完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
30秒前
shaylie完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
39秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
39秒前
浮浮世世应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
39秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
39秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
39秒前
42秒前
ilk666完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
1997SD完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
ding应助伶俐的高烽采纳,获得10
48秒前
dolabmu完成签到 ,获得积分10
50秒前
53秒前
54秒前
Dr.YYF.发布了新的文献求助10
55秒前
CipherSage应助Zylan采纳,获得10
56秒前
HD发布了新的文献求助10
57秒前
1997SD发布了新的文献求助10
57秒前
58秒前
tdtk发布了新的文献求助10
58秒前
昆工完成签到 ,获得积分10
59秒前
1分钟前
Lau发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
yzy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Dr.YYF.完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
HD完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
William_l_c完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Zilch驳回了cbj应助
1分钟前
1分钟前
HD关闭了HD文献求助
1分钟前
duoduoqian发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1041
Mentoring for Wellbeing in Schools 1000
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 600
Atlas of Liver Pathology: A Pattern-Based Approach 500
A Technologist’s Guide to Performing Sleep Studies 500
EEG in Childhood Epilepsy: Initial Presentation & Long-Term Follow-Up 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5493698
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4591739
关于积分的说明 14434492
捐赠科研通 4524114
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2478624
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1463650
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1436456