The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
Avalonx应助SZU_Julian采纳,获得10
1秒前
DoLaso发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
追梦人2016完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
刻苦思枫发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
无锡残烟发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
秀秀秀发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
安安发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
Pan完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
CHEN完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
zhk发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
活力的涵雁完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
允怡完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
yunlele完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
霓霓完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
安详的曲奇完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
小透明发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Alex完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
fwwwwww完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
奋斗雨灵发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
小夭发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
22秒前
zhk完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
ginchuodan发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
如意的复天完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
优秀的冬衣完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
科研通AI6.4应助小猴子采纳,获得10
26秒前
gggggd完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7515709
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9103930
关于积分的说明 19433936
捐赠科研通 7121079
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3253687
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2422495
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2240476