The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
香蕉觅云的应助被Any采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
怕黑忆文发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
qwert发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
SanXing三醒发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
小王完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Superman发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
昭蘅发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
铮铮铁骨发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
风趣的绿茶完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
迟山完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
孙元的应助被迅速宝川采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
mike发布了新的文献求助100
9秒前
FashionBoy的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
FashionBoy的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
wanci的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
英姑的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
赘婿的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
爆米花的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
科研通AI2S的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
大个的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
CipherSage的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
打打的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
领导范儿的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
文献快来完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
情怀的应助被侧柏叶采纳,获得10
12秒前
妮妮发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
积极凌旋发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
CLSI C56QG Examples of Hemolyzed, Icteric, and Lipemic/Turbid Samples Quick Guide 400
The USSR and Eastern Europe : periodicals in Western languages / compiled by Paul L. Horecky and Robert G. Carlton 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7801848
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9336227
关于积分的说明 20478392
捐赠科研通 7393331
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3326733
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2473526
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2344707