亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
不忘初鑫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被弗洛伊德采纳,获得10
3秒前
领导范儿的应助被Zzz采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
认真太阳完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
苏离完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
Y先生给Y先生的求助进行了留言
16秒前
坚强小霸王完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
23秒前
优秀的宛白完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
26秒前
三水发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
yulia发布了新的文献求助30
35秒前
Y先生给Y先生的求助进行了留言
39秒前
辛勤诗兰完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
张强发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
xt123xh完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
STEAD发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
53秒前
sanbuzhiwai发布了新的文献求助10
58秒前
张强完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
眼袋熊猫发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
现代的如容完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
优美草丛完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
paperx发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
loii的应助被yi采纳,获得20
1分钟前
Zzz发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
英姑的应助被ll采纳,获得10
1分钟前
kong完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
共享精神的应助被眼袋熊猫采纳,获得10
1分钟前
ll关闭了ll的文献求助
1分钟前
JanaL发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
中国器官捐献和移植发展报告(2024) 520
Organizational Behavior 510
Arbitrage Theory in Discrete and Continuous Time 500
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
English Longitudinal Study of Ageing: Waves 0-11, 1998-2024 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7823737
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9350262
关于积分的说明 20556645
捐赠科研通 7416466
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3334275
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2479580
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2354397