The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
洁净板栗完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
FashionBoy应助啊啊啊采纳,获得10
1秒前
一去应助恋风恋歌采纳,获得10
1秒前
liang发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
li发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
苹果朋友完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
小二郎应助忧心的板栗采纳,获得10
6秒前
在水一方应助文艺凉面采纳,获得10
7秒前
完美世界应助快乐雁风采纳,获得10
7秒前
朴实问儿完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
11秒前
orixero应助细腻的蚂蚁采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
加西亚完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
一去应助直率沛白采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
YHQ发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
藏锋守拙123完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
朴实问儿发布了新的文献求助30
19秒前
QST完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
儒雅的迎海完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
问梅发布了新的文献求助50
21秒前
21秒前
Mary发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
文艺凉面发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
淡定依玉完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
hv发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
清爽老九发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
26秒前
kick完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
玛卡巴卡完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
DW应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 700
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7742737
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9290913
关于积分的说明 20205032
捐赠科研通 7321214
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3307142
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2459092
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2317696