The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
鹿lu完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
正能量的涛完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
kyt发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
爱吃火锅发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
cy123关注了科研通微信公众号
1秒前
姜汐完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
张婉婷完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
smartboy完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
海海完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
cis2014完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
曹博完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
LIMO完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
年轻的小可完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
1504发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
2420574910完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
perovskite完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Ellen完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Pan完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Hello应助Mystic采纳,获得10
6秒前
霍霍完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Clover04完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
lkq完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
Susan完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研混子发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
不忘初心完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
957完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Sunny完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
NexusExplorer应助张婉婷采纳,获得10
8秒前
大海完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
奋斗不悔完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
潇湘夜雨完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
诗恋菲宇完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Zhang完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Jameson完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
文静的行恶完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to Helicopter and Tiltrotor Flight Simulation, Second Edition 2500
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Software that combines deep learning,3D reconstruction and CFD to analyze the state of carotid arteries from ultrasound imaging 600
Bounds for Statistical Estimation in Semiparametric Models 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6498403
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8294316
关于积分的说明 17697521
捐赠科研通 5594462
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2917665
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1894641
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1755279