The effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis

奇纳 医学 梅德林 护理部 护理结果分类 护理 系统回顾 干预(咨询) 患者满意度 初级护理 家庭医学 护士教育 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Klara Geltmeyer,Veerle Duprez,Marie Blondeel,Brecht Serraes,Kristof Eeckloo,Simon Malfait
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.16271
摘要

Abstract Aim To synthesize and assess the effectiveness of different care delivery models in a hospital setting, taking into account patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis in which a comparison was made between different care delivery models. Methods The search string consisted of four clusters: ‘nursing’, ‘care delivery models’, ‘hospital setting’ and ‘quantitative research designs’. Four electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to January 2023: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Results In total, 19 studies were included in the systematic review. The most commonly compared care delivery models were functional nursing to primary nursing ( n = 6), patient allocation to team nursing ( n = 4), team nursing to primary nursing ( n = 3) and functional nursing to modular nursing ( n = 3). Only one randomized crossover trial was found, other included studies were pretest–posttest designs or quasi‐experimental designs. The implementation of a nursing care delivery model was the study intervention. The following aspects of the intervention were not reported or inadequately described by the majority of the authors; tailoring of an intervention, modifications to an intervention and the adherence or fidelity to the intervention. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. Due to a high heterogeneity in outcome measures between the studies, a meta‐analysis of the included studies was not possible. All included studies had a high risk of overall bias. Conclusion This systematic review found mixed evidence, inconsistent reporting of certain elements of the interventions, high heterogeneity in outcome measures and low methodological quality. Although this systematic review could not answer which nursing care delivery model is the most effective or most promising, other important findings from this review may inform future research. Impact There are differences in care delivery model descriptions and a lack of agreement on the strengths and weaknesses of the care delivery models. No clear‐cut answer can be given about the effect of different care delivery models in a hospital setting on patient‐ and nurse‐related outcomes. Job satisfaction and quality of nursing care were the most commonly reported nursing outcomes, while patient satisfaction was the most commonly reported patient outcome. This review can support the development of future care delivery redesign strategies. Reporting method The systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Patient or public contribution No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
jichaiwang完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
hanxx完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
万物更始完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
张璟博完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
搜集达人应助xuan采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
朴素绿真完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
Aquilus发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
6秒前
赫连紫发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
鎓离子发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
典雅碧空发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
一期一发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
coolru发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
Hzml完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
叶子发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
樂楽完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
hh完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
文森特的向日葵完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
yang完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
龙柏寒发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
香蕉觅云应助磕盐耇采纳,获得10
13秒前
lavande发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
烹全鱼宴完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
瓜兮兮的卷毛完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
初景发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
molihuakai应助小插曲采纳,获得10
15秒前
17秒前
jackie发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
淡然的香菇完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 5000
How to Use Machine Learning in Chemistry: An Introduction 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Discerning Saints: Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation and Selective Prosociality at Work 500
Handbuch Trainingswissenschaft – Trainingslehre 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7581703
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9160833
关于积分的说明 19600524
捐赠科研通 7163920
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3266010
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2430947
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2257118