摘要
No AccessUrology PracticePatient Care1 Nov 2021Use of Antimicrobial-Coated Catheters in Preventing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections and Bacteriuria: A Meta-Analysis for CliniciansThis article is commented on by the following:Editorial CommentaryEditorial Commentary Rachel Vopni, Alesia Voice, Cornelia S. de Riese, John Garza, and Werner T. de Riese Rachel VopniRachel Vopni Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Urology, Lubbock, Texas More articles by this author , Alesia VoiceAlesia Voice Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Urology, Lubbock, Texas More articles by this author , Cornelia S. de RieseCornelia S. de Riese Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odessa, Texas More articles by this author , John GarzaJohn Garza Department of Mathematics, University of Texas, Permian Basin, Odessa, Texas More articles by this author , and Werner T. de RieseWerner T. de Riese *Correspondence: Department of Urology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601—4th Street STOP 7260, Lubbock, Texas 79430 telephone: 806-743-3862; E-mail Address: [email protected] http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1963-2334 Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Urology, Lubbock, Texas More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000254AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Introduction: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections comprise a significant burden to the health care system and are of major concern for indwelling catheter use. Catheter coatings have been studied for their potential to reduce risk of infection. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine the efficacy of coated catheters across clinical studies in preventing these common nosocomial infections. Methods: Searches were conducted on PubMed Central® and ScienceDirect using the terms “catheter,” “urinary tract infection” and “coated” or “antimicrobial.” Articles included were prospective randomized clinical studies of coated (experimental) vs uncoated (control) catheters published in English between the years 2000 and 2020. Results from included studies were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and conditional logistic regression. Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Tested urinary catheter coatings include silver, silver salt, nitrofurazone and metal-alloy. Conditional logistic regression (p <0.001) shows statistically significant negative association between coated catheter use and the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. The odds ratio of 0.80 and 95% confidence interval (0.74, 0.88) support protective effect of catheter coatings. Conclusions: Meta-analysis demonstrates a negative association of coated catheter and incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections, supporting that antimicrobial catheter coatings decreases incidence of infection across studies. Further clinical research is recommended to determine the potential for catheter coating adoption in clinical practice to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infection risk and incidence. References 1. : A review of the recent advances in antimicrobial coatings for urinary catheters. Acta Biomater 2017; 50: 20. Google Scholar 2. : Materials for urinary catheters: a review of their history and development in the UK. Med Eng Phys 2005; 27: 443. Google Scholar 3. : Catheters and sounds: the history of bladder catheterisation. Paraplegia 1995; 33: 429. Google Scholar 4. : Ureteral stents and foley catheters-associated urinary tract infections: the role of coatings and materials in infection prevention. Antibiotics (Basel) 2014; 3: 87. Google Scholar 5. : Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep (1974) 2007; 122: 160. Google Scholar 6. : Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: 78. Google Scholar 7. : Conditional logistic regression. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 151: 1191. Google Scholar 8. : A randomized crossover study of silver-coated urinary catheters in hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med (1960) 2000; 160: 3294. Google Scholar 9. : Randomized multi-centre trial of the effects of a catheter coated with hydrogel and silver salts on the incidence of hospital-acquired urinary tract infections. J Hosp Infect 2000; 45: 117. Google Scholar 10. : A prospective, controlled, randomized study of the effect of a slow‐release silver device on the frequency of urinary tract infection in newly catheterized patients. BJU Int 2000; 85: 54. Google Scholar 11. : A comparative multicentre study on the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection between nitrofurazone-coated and silicone catheters. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2004; 24: 65. Google Scholar 12. : A prospective trial of a novel, Silicone‐Based, Silver‐Coated Foley catheter for the prevention of nosocomial urinary tract infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006; 27: 38. Google Scholar 13. : Infection risk with nitrofurazone-impregnated urinary catheters in trauma patients: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 285. Google Scholar 14. : Noble metal alloy-coated latex versus silicone foley catheter in short-term catheterization: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2011; 45: 258. Google Scholar 15. : Antimicrobial catheters for reduction of symptomatic urinary tract infection in adults requiring short-term catheterisation in hospital: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 380: 1927. Google Scholar 16. : Application of a nanotechnology antimicrobial spray to prevent lower urinary tract infection: a multicenter urology trial. J Transl Med, suppl., 2012; 10: S14. Google Scholar 17. : Safety and efficacy of a novel silver-impregnated urinary catheter system for preventing catheter-associated bacteriuria: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Am J Infect Control 2015; 43: 260. Google Scholar 18. : Efficacy and safety of urinary catheters with silver alloy coating in patients with spinal cord injury: a multicentric pragmatic randomized controlled trial. the ESCALE trial. Spine J 2017; 17: 1650. Google Scholar 19. : The efficacy of noble metal alloy urinary catheters in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Urol Ann 2016; 8: 423. Google Scholar 20. : A randomized clinical trial comparing nitrofurazone‐coated and uncoated urinary catheters in kidney transplant recipients: results from a pilot study. Transpl Infect Dis 2019; 21: e13031. Google Scholar 21. : An investigation of the effectiveness against bacteriuria of silver-coated catheters in short-term urinary catheter applications: a randomized controlled study. J Infect Chemother 2019; 25: 797. Google Scholar 22. : The role of foley catheter coated with gold, silver, and palladium in decreasing urinary tract infections in the intensive care unit; a letter to editor. Arch Acad Emerg Med 2019; 7: 40. Google Scholar 23. : Prevalence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in neurosurgical intensive care patients—the overdiagnosis of urinary tract infections. Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) 2019; 11: e5494. Google Scholar 24. : Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50: 625. Google Scholar 25. Appendix F: CAUTI Prevention in Long-Term Care: Frequently Asked Questions. 2017. Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/quality/tools/cauti-ltc/modules/resources/tools/prevent/clinical-faqs.html.Accessed January 12, 2021. Google Scholar 26. : The antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles and its application in dentistry. Int J Nanomed 2020; 15: 2555. Google Scholar 27. : The efficacy of silver alloy-coated urinary catheters in preventing urinary tract infection: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 1998; 105: 236. Google Scholar 28. : Nitrofurantoin: mechanism of action and implications for resistance development in common uropathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother, suppl., 1994; 33: 23. Google Scholar 29. : Antimicrobial efficacy and synergy of metal ions against enterococcus faecium, klebsiella pneumoniae and acinetobacter baumannii in planktonic and biofilm phenotypes. Scientific Rep 2017; 7: 5911. Google Scholar 30. : Encrusted and incarcerated urinary bladder catheter: what are the options?Libyan J Med 2010; 5: 5686. Google Scholar Submitted April 13, 2021. The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. This study was deemed exempt from IRB review. © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesUrology Practice18 Aug 2021Editorial CommentaryUrology Practice18 Aug 2021Editorial Commentary Volume 8Issue 6November 2021Page: 705-712 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsprimary preventionurinary cathetersanti-infective agentsurinary tract infectionsMetricsAuthor Information Rachel Vopni Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Urology, Lubbock, Texas More articles by this author Alesia Voice Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Urology, Lubbock, Texas More articles by this author Cornelia S. de Riese Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odessa, Texas More articles by this author John Garza Department of Mathematics, University of Texas, Permian Basin, Odessa, Texas More articles by this author Werner T. de Riese Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Urology, Lubbock, Texas *Correspondence: Department of Urology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601—4th Street STOP 7260, Lubbock, Texas 79430 telephone: 806-743-3862; E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Expand All Submitted April 13, 2021. The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. This study was deemed exempt from IRB review. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...