Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation Using a Transforaminal Approach Versus an Interlaminar Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

医学 Oswestry残疾指数 经皮 置信区间 外科 椎间盘切除术 腰椎间盘突出症 腰椎 椎间盘切除术 透视 入射(几何) 骨科手术 腰椎 腰痛 内科学 病理 替代医学 物理 光学
作者
Jiageng Chen,Xiyue Jing,Changping Li,Yu Jiang,Sen Cheng,Jun Ma
出处
期刊:World Neurosurgery [Elsevier]
卷期号:116: 412-420.e2 被引量:63
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.075
摘要

Several studies have compared the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH) using a transforaminal approach with an interlaminar approach, but with contradictory results. The aim of this study was to explore the comparison of efficacy and safety between percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) for L5-S1 LDH.Six common databases were comprehensively searched, and relevant studies were included into the analysis when they met all the inclusion criteria.Nine studies involving 621 patients were included into the study. The results indicated that PETD was significantly associated with greater fluoroscopy times (mean difference [MD], 9.28 times; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.84-11.71; P < 0.01) and longer operative time (MD, 16.51 minutes; 95% CI, 4.01-29.02; P = 0.01) compared with PEID. However, there were no distinct differences between PETD and PEID in estimated blood loss (P = 0.24), bed time after surgery (P = 0.32), hospitalization time (P = 0.27), or MacNab evaluation (P = 0.78). Similarly, no obvious differences were detected between PETD and PEID regarding Visual Analogue Scale score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) when measured preoperatively, 1 day postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, or at the last follow up. In addition, no significant difference was found regarding overall incidence of complications between PETD and PEID (P = 0.14). Nevertheless, a significantly lower incidence rate of dural tear was observed in PETD compared with PEID (P = 0.04).PETD had comparable clinical efficacy and safety compared with PEID; however, PEID was superior to PETD regarding fluoroscopy times and operative time. Therefore, PEID might be a better surgical procedure for L5S1 LDH.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
清禾kat发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
5秒前
Akim应助小白采纳,获得10
7秒前
SciGPT应助小白采纳,获得10
7秒前
斯文败类应助小白采纳,获得30
8秒前
今后应助小白采纳,获得10
8秒前
机智绝悟发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
tzb完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
17秒前
lala完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
18秒前
糊涂发布了新的文献求助20
21秒前
树上熊发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
bryceeluo应助完美的一天采纳,获得10
23秒前
NexusExplorer应助lala采纳,获得10
24秒前
第八十六发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
Always完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
美好斓发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
东箭南金发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
29秒前
dominate应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
29秒前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
29秒前
薰硝壤应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
薰硝壤应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
30秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
dominate应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
30秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
科目三应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
30秒前
30秒前
30秒前
30秒前
折花浅笑完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
35秒前
大西瓜完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
高分求助中
The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication 2500
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Pharmacogenomics: Applications to Patient Care, Third Edition 1000
Studien zur Ideengeschichte der Gesetzgebung 1000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Genera Insectorum: Mantodea, Fam. Mantidæ, Subfam. Hymenopodinæ (Classic Reprint) 800
Ethnicities: Media, Health, and Coping 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3087327
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2740025
关于积分的说明 7557198
捐赠科研通 2389737
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1267375
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 613656
版权声明 598611