缓和医疗
奇纳
心理干预
康复
包裹体(矿物)
医学
背景(考古学)
生活质量(医疗保健)
梅德林
人口
护理部
心理学
物理疗法
法学
古生物学
环境卫生
生物
社会心理学
政治学
作者
Vítor Parola,Adriana Coelho,Hugo Neves,Daniela Cardoso,Maria Almeida,Arménio Cruz,João Apóstolo
出处
期刊:JBI evidence synthesis
[Joanna Briggs Institute]
日期:2020-09-10
卷期号:18 (11): 2349-2356
被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.11124/jbies-20-00024
摘要
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to examine and map interventions of palliative rehabilitation that are implemented and evaluated in palliative care. Introduction: Palliative rehabilitation is defined as the process of helping individuals with a progressive, often advanced or incurable disease reach their physical, psychological, and social potential consistent with physiological and environmental limitations and life preferences. Rehabilitation may prolong functional independence and improve quality of life. Information on palliative rehabilitation interventions, their characteristics, contexts, and population is dispersed throughout the literature, hence the need for a scoping review. Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will consider all studies that focus on qualified health care professionals working in palliative care who are caring for patients 18 years of age or older, and studies that focus on the concepts of palliative rehabilitation interventions. This scoping review will consider all palliative rehabilitation interventions implemented and evaluated in the context of palliative care. Methods: The search strategy aims to find published and unpublished studies. The databases to be searched will include CINAHL Complete, PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PEDro. The search for unpublished studies will include DART-Europe, OpenGrey, and RCAAP. Studies published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese carried out from 2009 onward will be considered for inclusion. Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by two reviewers. Data will be extracted and presented in tabular form and a narrative summary that aligns with the review's objective. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI