[A clinical study on the determination of cuff pressure in artificial airway by minimum air leakage method].

医学 袖口 插管 麻醉 仰卧位 外科 气道 喉罩 喉罩气道
作者
Hongyun Teng,Xiuling Cheng,Wanjie Yang,Yanlei Zuo,Ning Hua,Xiuhua Wei
出处
期刊:PubMed [National Institutes of Health]
卷期号:32 (4): 439-442 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200122-00143
摘要

To compare the cuff pressure and leakage volume and the related complications of filling the tracheal tube cuff by minimum air leakage method and cuff pressure manometer method after endotracheal intubation, so as to provide theoretical basis for patients who was intubated to obtain appropriate cuff pressure.A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. 100 patients admitted to the department of critical care medicine of the Fifth Center Hospital in Tianjin from December 2015 to June 2019 were enrolled. According to the random number table method, the patients were divided into the experimental group and control group, with 50 patients in each group. After successful endotracheal intubation, all patients were placed in a supine position with the head of the bed raised by 30 degree angle. The experimental group used the minimum air leakage method, and used the cuff pressure manometer to obtain the cuff pressure. In the control group, cuff pressure was maintained at 25-30 cmH2O (1 cmH2O = 0.098 kPa). Parameters such as cuff pressure and ventilator leakage volume at the beginning and 4 hours, 8 hours after the inflation were compared between the two groups, as well as the incidence of ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) and airway complications after extubation.Among the 100 cases, 53 were males and 47 were females. The age ranged from 23 to 87 years old, with an average of (68.53±8.46) years old. The intubation time ranged from 1 to 16 days. (1) At 4 hours and 8 hours after inflation, the cuff pressures of the two groups were lower than that of the first time of inflation, and the air leakage of the ventilator increased gradually with the extension of time. Compared with the control group, cuff pressures at each time point in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group [mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 33.72±9.14 vs. 25.68±5.26 at 0 hour, 30.54±7.81 vs. 24.35±4.93 at 4 hours, 26.57±5.64 vs. 22.42±4.14 at 8 hours, all P < 0.05], and ventilator leakage volumes were smaller than those in the control group (mL: 25.57±8.51 vs. 34.65±9.47 at 0 hour, 40.54±8.51 vs. 60.34±7.85 at 4 hours, both P < 0.05). (2) The incidence of VAP in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (4% vs. 10%, P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of other airway complications between the experimental group and control group (airway mucosal edema: 14% vs. 12%, ulcer: 8% vs. 6%, tracheal esophageal fistula: 0% vs. 0%, hoarseness: 4% vs. 6%, cough: 30% vs. 34%, sore throat: 28% vs. 32%, tracheal softening: 0% vs. 0%, cuff rupture: 10% vs. 8%, all P > 0.05).The optimal cuff pressure is very important for preventing VAP and reducing airway complications. The minimum air leakage method makes the clinical obtained endotracheal intubation cuff pressure more accurately, with less air leakage, safe and effective, and it is worthy of clinical promotion.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Owen应助畅快梦山采纳,获得20
刚刚
1秒前
老曹发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
大陈发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
月夕完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
luhanwei完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
DXXP完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
lhz发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
hhh发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
CipherSage应助397753034采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
davyean完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
落幕熊猫完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
乐乐应助张晓倩采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
阿志发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
睡个好觉发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
luckyhan发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
deacle发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
zpp完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
坦率涵梅发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
12138完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
shilly发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
浮游呦呦完成签到,获得积分0
15秒前
激昂的逊完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
负责的大船应助DAYDAY采纳,获得10
16秒前
陆程文完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
瞿寒发布了新的文献求助30
18秒前
397753034发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introducing the Learning Sciences 1000
2026年中国辛酸癸酸聚乙二醇甘油酯行业市场现状调查及投资机会研判报告 1000
2026年中国辛酸癸酸聚乙二醇甘油酯行业市场规模及竞争格局分析报告 1000
Resiliency Scale for Adolescents--Chinese Version 800
48V Low-voltage Power Distribution Network (PDN) Architecture Industry Report, 2024 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7325876
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8941067
关于积分的说明 18960345
捐赠科研通 6982268
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3215711
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2382867
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2195052