CT Screening for Colorectal Cancer

HomeRadioGraphicsVol. 22, No. 6 PreviousNext Plenary SessionCT Screening for Colorectal CancerJudy YeeJudy YeeAuthor Affiliations1From the Department of Radiology, UCSF Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4150 Clement St, San Francisco, CA 94121. From the Plenary Session, Friday Imaging Symposium: Screening for Cancer, at the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 25, 2002; revision requested April 19 and received June 28; accepted July 2. Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: [email protected]).Judy YeePublished Online:Nov 1 2002https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.226025064MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References 1 Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52:23-47. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Von Eschenbach AC, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52:8-22. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 1997; 112:594-642. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1365-1371. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Kronberg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, et al. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 1996; 348:1467-1471. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996; 348:1472-1477. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP, et al. Effect of fecal occult blood testing on mortality from colorectal cancer: a case-control study. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118:1-6. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Lieberman D, Weiss D, Bond J, Wiess NS. A case control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:653-657. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, Surawicz T, Marcus PM. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84:1572-1575. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155:1741-1748. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Anderson N, Cook HB, Coates R. Colonoscopically detected colorectal cancer missed on barium enema. Gastrointest Radiol 1991; 16:123-127. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Brady AP, Stevenson GW, Stevenson I. Colorectal cancer overlooked at barium enema examination and colonoscopy: a continuing perceptual problem. Radiology 1994; 192:373-378. Link, Google Scholar13 deRoos A, Hermans J, Shaw PC, Kroon H. Colon polyps and carcinomas: prospective comparison of the single- and double-contrast examination in the same patients. Radiology 1985; 154:11-13. Link, Google Scholar14 Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Kaster S, Buckley JS. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 1997; 112:17-23. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Kewenter J, Breringe H, Engaras B, Haglind E. The value of flexible sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium enema in the diagnosis of neoplasms in the rectum and colon in subjects with a positive hemoccult: results of 1831 rectosigmoidoscopies and double-contrast enemas. Endoscopy 1995; 27:159-163. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16 Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG, et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1766-1772. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17 Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112:24-28. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar18 Vignati P, Welch JP, Cohen JL. Endoscopic localization of colon cancers. Surg Endosc 1994; 8:1085-1087. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Wall SD. The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:1-4. Google Scholar20 Yee J, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Akerkar GA, Wall SD, McQuaid KM. Colonic distention and prospective evaluation of colorectal polyp detection with and without glucagon during CT colonography (abstr). Radiology 1999; 213(P):256. Google Scholar21 Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, Reynolds KF, Raptopoulos VD. Does glucagon improve colonic distention and polyp detection during CT colonography? (abstr). Radiology 1999; 213(P):341. Link, Google Scholar22 Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 2000; 216:704-711. Link, Google Scholar23 Chen SC, Lu DS, Hecht JR, et al. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:595-599. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar24 Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM, et al. CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:989-995. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar25 Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1543-1549. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001; 219:685-692. Link, Google Scholar27 Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1496-1503. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, McCollough CH, Harmsen WS. CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 2001; 219:461-465. Link, Google Scholar29 Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, Milano A, Megibow AJ. Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:561-564. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, Goldberg SN, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:913-918. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar31 Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 1999; 210:423-428. Link, Google Scholar32 Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ. Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 2000; 215:353-357. Link, Google Scholar33 Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, et al. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 219:693-698. Link, Google Scholar34 Zalis ME, Hahn PF. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:646-648. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar35 Summers RM, Johnson CD, Pusanik LM, Malley JD, Youssef AM, Reed JE. Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 2001; 219:51-59. Link, Google Scholar36 Yoshida H, Masutani Y, MacEneaney P, Rubin DT, Dachman AH. Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology 2002; 222:327-336. Link, Google Scholar37 Ahlquist DA, Skoletsky JE, Boynton KA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening by detection of altered human DNA in stool: feasibility of a multi-target assay system. Gastroenterology 2000; 119:1219-1227. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: Nov 2002 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByDiagnostic utility of whole body CT scanning in patients with unexplained weight lossYonggengGoh, Yock YoungDan, WynneChua, PoojaJagmohan, Joseph King-TakLee, Yee LiangThian, ShahradTaheri2018 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 13, No. 7Intravenous contrast enhanced computed tomography colonoscopy in children with suspected colonic polypsAnmolBhatia, Akshay K.Saxena, NaveenKalra, Kushaljit S.Sodhi, Babu R.Thapa, Katragadda L.N.Rao, NiranjanKhandelwal2013 | European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 82, No. 6Magnetic resonance colonography: comparison between T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation (THRIVE) and balanced fast field echo (bFFE) using an air enema or water–gadolinium enemaM.S.Kim, C.S.Park, E.J.Lee, M.H.Rho, N.H.Park, J.H.Joh, H.J.Park, J.M.Bae2010 | Clinical Radiology, Vol. 65, No. 4The GI fluoroscopy suite in the early twenty-first centuryDavid A.Boyajian, Alexander R.Margulis2008 | Abdominal Imaging, Vol. 33, No. 2Magnetic Resonance Colonography for the Evaluation of Colonic Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseF. BilgeErgen, DenizAkata, MutluHayran, OzgurHarmanci, SerapArslan, CeylaBasaran, Hero K.Hussain2008 | Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, Vol. 32, No. 6Small bowel hydro-MR imaging for optimized ileocecal distension in Crohn's disease: Should an additional rectal enema filling be performed?WaleedAjaj, Thomas C.Lauenstein, JostLanghorst, ChristianeKuehle, MathiasGoyen, ThomasZoepf, Stefan G.Ruehm, GuidoGerken, Jorg F.Debatin, Susanne C.Goehde2005 | Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 22, No. 1Virtual Colonoscopy2005 | Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol. 106, No. 2Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography1Jeff LFidler, Joel GFletcher, C.DanielJohnson, James EHuprich, John MBarlow, FranklinEarnest, Brian JBartholmai2004 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 7Recommended Articles RSNA Education Exhibits RSNA Case Collection Vol. 22, No. 6 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download