医学
颈动脉内膜切除术
再狭窄
冲程(发动机)
动脉内膜切除术
狭窄
回顾性队列研究
颈动脉支架置入术
支架
内科学
心脏病学
外科
单中心
放射科
机械工程
工程类
作者
Umberto Bracale,Antonio Peluso,Ernesto Di Mauro,Luca del Guercio,Maria Donata Di Taranto,Giannotta N,Nicola Ielapi,Michele Provenzano,Michele Andreucci,Raffaele Serra
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.10.073
摘要
Severe carotid stenosis (CS) is a major risk factor for stroke. Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold standard revascularization technique of CS while carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered an alternative treatment option, especially in high-risk patients or those with relative contraindications to CEA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of CEA and CAS with Roadsaver® stent device.We made a retrospective analysis of 119 patients undergoing treatment of CS. All CS were evaluated with imaging exams. The patients were divided into CEA group and CAS group. As primary endpoints of the study overall and cardiovascular cause - related mortality, freedom from stroke, and restenosis were considered. All patients were followed up and revaluated with duplex scan over a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 36 months (follow-up mean time 22.3 ± 3.4 months).In the whole cohort 86 of 119 patients underwent CEA and 33 of 119 CAS. Risk factors were superposable in both groups. During follow-up, we observed 4 deaths, 2 cardiovascular events and 12 restenosis. CEA was associated with lower death probability than CAS (P = 0.036). Probability of Restenosis and cardiovascular events did not vary between CAS and CEA groups.Albeit CEA remains the gold standard for the treatment of severe CS, CAS with new double layer micromesh stent can be considered a useful and safe alternative in some clinical conditions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI