医学
创伤中心
损伤严重程度评分
复苏
急诊医学
相对风险
内科学
队列
穿透伤
随机对照试验
重症监护医学
回顾性队列研究
毒物控制
外科
伤害预防
置信区间
迟钝的
作者
Matthew R. Thau,Ted Liu,Neha A. Sathe,Grant E. O’Keefe,Bryce R. H. Robinson,Eileen M. Bulger,Charles E. Wade,Erin E. Fox,John B. Holcomb,W. Conrad Liles,Ian B. Stanaway,Carmen Mikacenic,Mark M. Wurfel,Pavan K. Bhatraju,Eric D. Morrell
出处
期刊:JAMA Surgery
[American Medical Association]
日期:2023-04-26
卷期号:158 (7): 728-728
被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0819
摘要
It is not clear which severely injured patients with hemorrhagic shock may benefit most from a 1:1:1 vs 1:1:2 (plasma:platelets:red blood cells) resuscitation strategy. Identification of trauma molecular endotypes may reveal subgroups of patients with differential treatment response to various resuscitation strategies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI