亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Whole blood transfusion in the treatment of acute hemorrhage, a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 输血 重症监护医学 系统回顾 内科学 梅德林 化学 生物化学
作者
Robert A. van der Horst,Tim W.H. Rijnhout,Femke Noorman,Boudewijn L. S. Borger van der Burg,Oscar J.F. Van Waes,M.H.J. Verhofstad,Rigo Hoencamp
出处
期刊:The journal of trauma and acute care surgery [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:95 (2): 256-266 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1097/ta.0000000000004000
摘要

BACKGROUND Whole blood (WB) transfusion received renewed interest after recent armed conflicts. The effectiveness as compared with blood component transfusion (BCT) is, however, still topic of debate. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of WB ± BCT as compared with BCT transfusion on survival in trauma patients with acute hemorrhage. METHODS Studies published up to January 16, 2023, including patients with traumatic hemorrhage comparing WB ± BCT and BCT were included in meta-analysis. Subanalyses were performed on the effectiveness of WB in the treatment of civilian or military trauma patients, patients with massive hemorrhage and on platelet (PLT)/red blood cell (RBC), plasma/RBC and WB/RBC ratios. Methodological quality of studies was interpreted using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42022296900. RESULTS Random effect pooled odds ratio (OR) for 24 hours mortality in civilian and military patients treated with WB as compared with BCT was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53–0.97). In subanalysis of studies conducted in civilian setting (n = 20), early (4 hours, 6 hours, and emergency department) and 24 hours mortality was lower in WB groups compared with BCT groups (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44–0.96 and OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52–0.98). No difference in late mortality (28 days, 30 days, in-hospital) was found. In military settings (n = 7), there was no difference in early, 24 hours, or late mortality between groups. The WB groups received significant higher PLT/RBC ( p = 0.030) during early treatment and significant higher PLT/RBC and plasma/RBC ratios during 24 hours of treatment ( p = 0.031 and p = 0.007). The overall risk of bias in the majority of studies was judged as serious due to serious risk on confounding and selection bias, and unclear information regarding cointerventions. CONCLUSION Civilian trauma patients with acute traumatic hemorrhage treated with WB ± BCT as compared to BCT had lower odds on early and 24-hour mortality. In addition, WB transfusion resulted in higher PLT/RBC and plasma/RBC ratios. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis; Level III.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
4秒前
wanci应助Hero采纳,获得10
6秒前
Snow886发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
14秒前
852应助NattyPoe采纳,获得10
15秒前
周炎完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
周炎发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
斯文败类应助周炎采纳,获得10
28秒前
30秒前
NattyPoe发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
36秒前
嗷嗷嗷发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
FashionBoy应助嘿嘿采纳,获得10
1分钟前
英俊的铭应助NattyPoe采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
嘿嘿发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
NattyPoe发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
ys完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
领导范儿应助NattyPoe采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
NattyPoe发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
何妨倒置发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
郭濹涵完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
小蘑菇应助何妨倒置采纳,获得10
3分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
3分钟前
何妨倒置完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
完美世界应助小李老博采纳,获得10
3分钟前
顾矜应助柚子想吃橘子采纳,获得10
3分钟前
生动的箴发布了新的文献求助20
4分钟前
kuoping完成签到,获得积分0
5分钟前
Akim应助nana2hao采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 1000
First commercial application of ELCRES™ HTV150A film in Nichicon capacitors for AC-DC inverters: SABIC at PCIM Europe 1000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5996935
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7472170
关于积分的说明 16081537
捐赠科研通 5140002
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2756113
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1730524
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1629781