佩萨
医学
随机对照试验
栓剂
不利影响
益生菌
中止
阴道分泌物
阴道
内科学
妇科
外科
生物
细菌
药理学
遗传学
作者
Elisabeth C. Sappenfield,Colleen Mellen,Jennifer Wilcox,Deirdre Elizabeth O’Hanlon,David M. O’Sullivan,Elena Tunitsky-Bitton
标识
DOI:10.1097/spv.0000000000001379
摘要
Importance Pessary-related adverse effects are common, and treatment options are limited. Probiotics may improve pessary-related adverse effects by altering the vaginal microenvironment. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a vaginal probiotic suppository on the vaginal microenvironment among pessary users. Study Design Women who used pessaries were randomized to vaginal probiotic suppository use versus without use. The intervention was a vaginal probiotic suppository and moisturizing vaginal gel. The vaginal microenvironment was assessed using Gram stain and Nugent's criteria at baseline and 3 months by a microbiologist blinded to group allocation. Symptoms and experience with use of the probiotic were assessed using questionnaires. The primary outcome was change in lactobacilli count on Nugent subscore at 3 months. Results A total of 147 postmenopausal women were randomized (86 to the intervention arm and 61 to the control arm), and 124 (87.9%) presented for a 3-month follow-up. There was no difference between the arms in age, race, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. A majority of participants had the pessary managed by the health care professional (intervention arm vs control arm, 46 [76.7%] vs 55 [68.8%]; P = 0.30). Composition of the vaginal microenvironment did not differ with or without probiotic treatment at 3 months. Bother from vaginal symptoms, including discharge, itching, and discomfort, did not differ between arms. Adverse effects from the intervention were minor, resolved with discontinuation, and occurred at 39.1%. Conclusion Vaginal probiotic suppository use did not affect the composition of the vaginal microenvironment, patient satisfaction, or vaginal symptoms after 3 months of use in pessary users.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI