Assessment of melanoma precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk information

医学 清晰 利克特量表 人口学 老年学 临床心理学 心理学 发展心理学 生物化学 化学 社会学
作者
John Charles A. Lacson,Stephanie M. Forgas,Scarlet H. Doyle,Qian Lü,Jocelyn Del Rio,Stella Valavanis,Rodrigo Carvajal,Guillermo González-Calderón,Young‐Chul Kim,Richard G. Roetzheim,Susan T. Vadaparampil,Peter A. Kanetsky
出处
期刊:Translational behavioral medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:12 (5): 683-687 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac034
摘要

Abstract Few studies have examined cognitive responses to mailed precision prevention materials. MC1R is a robust, well-described melanoma susceptibility marker. The purpose was to assess cognitive responses to generic or precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk. Non-Hispanic White participants (n = 1134) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial received either precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk (higher/average) or generic prevention (standard) materials. Six months after baseline, 808 (71.3%) participants reported on the amount of prevention materials read (5-point scale); believability and clarity of materials; intention to change preventive behaviors (7-point Likert scale); and recall of their MC1R genetic risk. Comparisons were conducted using Kruskal–Wallis and chi-squared tests. Overall, participants read most to all (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) of the prevention materials, reported high believability (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1) and clarity (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and moderate intention to change preventive behaviors (Mdn = 5, IQR = 2). Higher-risk participants reported slightly less clarity (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) than either average-risk (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1, p = 2.50 × 10−3) or standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = 2.30 × 10−5); and slightly less believability (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1) than standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = .005). Higher-risk participants were 2.21 times as likely (95% CI = 1.43–3.43) to misremember or forget their risk compared to average-risk participants; misremembering was observed only among higher-risk participants (14%). Mailed precision prevention information were mostly read, highly believable and clear, and resulted in moderate levels of intention to change sun protection behaviors, bolstering the feasibility of population-level precision prevention. Defensive reactions may explain lower clarity, believability, and higher incorrect risk recall among higher-risk participants.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
LL发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
zy完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
够了完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
阿萨十大发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
Lshang应助JuinZhu采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
恋风恋歌发布了新的文献求助50
5秒前
霞霞完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
smilling完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
CipherSage应助木木采纳,获得10
6秒前
离研通完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.4应助明亮翠桃采纳,获得10
7秒前
windyhill完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
漏网之鱼完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
踏实紫烟发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
无私的妍完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
萧一发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
曾珍完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
牛顿的苹果完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
张嘉雯完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
科研通AI6.3应助zsc采纳,获得10
10秒前
12秒前
夏日随笔完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
uu完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
大方的笑萍完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
在水一方应助怕黑小熊猫采纳,获得20
14秒前
16秒前
阿萨十大完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
只只完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
19秒前
CFD应助fortune采纳,获得10
19秒前
高分求助中
液晶指向矢仿真分析数据集 8888
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 1000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
Writing Systems 500
A Handbook of User Experience Research & Design in Libraries 400
Understanding Modeling and Simulation of Polymerization Reactions 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6896799
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8592409
关于积分的说明 18244363
捐赠科研通 6293693
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3060847
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2079818
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2038622