Assessment of melanoma precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk information

医学 清晰 利克特量表 人口学 老年学 临床心理学 心理学 发展心理学 生物化学 社会学 化学
作者
John Charles A. Lacson,Stephanie M. Forgas,Scarlet H. Doyle,Qian Lü,Jocelyn Del Rio,Stella Valavanis,Rodrigo Carvajal,Guillermo González-Calderón,Young‐Chul Kim,Richard G. Roetzheim,Susan T. Vadaparampil,Peter A. Kanetsky
出处
期刊:Translational behavioral medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:12 (5): 683-687 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac034
摘要

Abstract Few studies have examined cognitive responses to mailed precision prevention materials. MC1R is a robust, well-described melanoma susceptibility marker. The purpose was to assess cognitive responses to generic or precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk. Non-Hispanic White participants (n = 1134) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial received either precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk (higher/average) or generic prevention (standard) materials. Six months after baseline, 808 (71.3%) participants reported on the amount of prevention materials read (5-point scale); believability and clarity of materials; intention to change preventive behaviors (7-point Likert scale); and recall of their MC1R genetic risk. Comparisons were conducted using Kruskal–Wallis and chi-squared tests. Overall, participants read most to all (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) of the prevention materials, reported high believability (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1) and clarity (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and moderate intention to change preventive behaviors (Mdn = 5, IQR = 2). Higher-risk participants reported slightly less clarity (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) than either average-risk (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1, p = 2.50 × 10−3) or standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = 2.30 × 10−5); and slightly less believability (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1) than standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = .005). Higher-risk participants were 2.21 times as likely (95% CI = 1.43–3.43) to misremember or forget their risk compared to average-risk participants; misremembering was observed only among higher-risk participants (14%). Mailed precision prevention information were mostly read, highly believable and clear, and resulted in moderate levels of intention to change sun protection behaviors, bolstering the feasibility of population-level precision prevention. Defensive reactions may explain lower clarity, believability, and higher incorrect risk recall among higher-risk participants.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
祖乐松完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
酒精不能消毒关注了科研通微信公众号
刚刚
qing11发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
pwh完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Miriammmmm完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
矮小的醉香完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zzq168完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
mojio完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
loii应助汪汪队采纳,获得30
3秒前
yuejing完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
雪碧完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
科研狗应助整齐唯雪采纳,获得50
5秒前
5秒前
mojio发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
英姑应助李妍庆采纳,获得10
6秒前
柠觉呢发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
未央完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
qing11发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
周享完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
零药完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
肥猫完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Celia完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
英姑应助chengsi采纳,获得10
14秒前
我爱学习发布了新的文献求助20
14秒前
15秒前
Echogaogao完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
白糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
刘膝关节健康完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
AJ发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
GoGoGo完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Echogaogao发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
qing11发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
晶种分解过程与铝酸钠溶液混合强度关系的探讨 8888
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Leading Academic-Practice Partnerships in Nursing and Healthcare: A Paradigm for Change 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6430339
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8246364
关于积分的说明 17536707
捐赠科研通 5486740
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2895867
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1872323
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1711877