Assessment of melanoma precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk information

医学 清晰 利克特量表 人口学 老年学 临床心理学 心理学 发展心理学 生物化学 社会学 化学
作者
John Charles A. Lacson,Stephanie M. Forgas,Scarlet H. Doyle,Qian Lü,Jocelyn Del Rio,Stella Valavanis,Rodrigo Carvajal,Guillermo González-Calderón,Young‐Chul Kim,Richard G. Roetzheim,Susan T. Vadaparampil,Peter A. Kanetsky
出处
期刊:Translational behavioral medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:12 (5): 683-687 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac034
摘要

Abstract Few studies have examined cognitive responses to mailed precision prevention materials. MC1R is a robust, well-described melanoma susceptibility marker. The purpose was to assess cognitive responses to generic or precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk. Non-Hispanic White participants (n = 1134) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial received either precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk (higher/average) or generic prevention (standard) materials. Six months after baseline, 808 (71.3%) participants reported on the amount of prevention materials read (5-point scale); believability and clarity of materials; intention to change preventive behaviors (7-point Likert scale); and recall of their MC1R genetic risk. Comparisons were conducted using Kruskal–Wallis and chi-squared tests. Overall, participants read most to all (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) of the prevention materials, reported high believability (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1) and clarity (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and moderate intention to change preventive behaviors (Mdn = 5, IQR = 2). Higher-risk participants reported slightly less clarity (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) than either average-risk (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1, p = 2.50 × 10−3) or standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = 2.30 × 10−5); and slightly less believability (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1) than standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = .005). Higher-risk participants were 2.21 times as likely (95% CI = 1.43–3.43) to misremember or forget their risk compared to average-risk participants; misremembering was observed only among higher-risk participants (14%). Mailed precision prevention information were mostly read, highly believable and clear, and resulted in moderate levels of intention to change sun protection behaviors, bolstering the feasibility of population-level precision prevention. Defensive reactions may explain lower clarity, believability, and higher incorrect risk recall among higher-risk participants.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
谢同学发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
搜集达人应助等待黎明采纳,获得10
1秒前
周易完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
mavis发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
一灯大师发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
专注的问寒应助K.Cui采纳,获得10
2秒前
淡定发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
arT完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
今后应助WWZ采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
Teletubbies应助Frank采纳,获得30
4秒前
ZHDNCG完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
Vyasa完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
小马甲应助大气靳采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
小蘑菇应助黄伟凯采纳,获得10
6秒前
L~完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
cc举报wenzi96求助涉嫌违规
7秒前
ChiariRay完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Forever完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
光亮亦竹完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
Shumaila发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
魔幻灵煌发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Lucas应助淡定采纳,获得10
12秒前
yyds发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
chimchim完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
keyan完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
nostalgic完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
小刺猬发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5718021
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5250051
关于积分的说明 15284272
捐赠科研通 4868198
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2614063
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1563973
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1521425