Assessment of melanoma precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk information

医学 清晰 利克特量表 人口学 老年学 临床心理学 心理学 发展心理学 生物化学 社会学 化学
作者
John Charles A. Lacson,Stephanie M. Forgas,Scarlet H. Doyle,Qian Lü,Jocelyn Del Rio,Stella Valavanis,Rodrigo Carvajal,Guillermo González-Calderón,Young‐Chul Kim,Richard G. Roetzheim,Susan T. Vadaparampil,Peter A. Kanetsky
出处
期刊:Translational behavioral medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:12 (5): 683-687 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac034
摘要

Abstract Few studies have examined cognitive responses to mailed precision prevention materials. MC1R is a robust, well-described melanoma susceptibility marker. The purpose was to assess cognitive responses to generic or precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk. Non-Hispanic White participants (n = 1134) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial received either precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk (higher/average) or generic prevention (standard) materials. Six months after baseline, 808 (71.3%) participants reported on the amount of prevention materials read (5-point scale); believability and clarity of materials; intention to change preventive behaviors (7-point Likert scale); and recall of their MC1R genetic risk. Comparisons were conducted using Kruskal–Wallis and chi-squared tests. Overall, participants read most to all (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) of the prevention materials, reported high believability (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1) and clarity (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and moderate intention to change preventive behaviors (Mdn = 5, IQR = 2). Higher-risk participants reported slightly less clarity (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) than either average-risk (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1, p = 2.50 × 10−3) or standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = 2.30 × 10−5); and slightly less believability (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1) than standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = .005). Higher-risk participants were 2.21 times as likely (95% CI = 1.43–3.43) to misremember or forget their risk compared to average-risk participants; misremembering was observed only among higher-risk participants (14%). Mailed precision prevention information were mostly read, highly believable and clear, and resulted in moderate levels of intention to change sun protection behaviors, bolstering the feasibility of population-level precision prevention. Defensive reactions may explain lower clarity, believability, and higher incorrect risk recall among higher-risk participants.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Ava应助NUSPC采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
洁净的冬日完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
淡然叫兽发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
汉堡包应助极致采纳,获得10
1秒前
金少爷发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
jjqzju完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
骏驰天下发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
zzt33完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
ding应助专注的小熊猫采纳,获得30
1秒前
1秒前
Jasper应助hjw采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
嵩月完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
CcC完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
甯远完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
想吃芝士荔枝烤鱼完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
香蕉觅云应助Shafrir采纳,获得10
3秒前
rance发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
liujiahao发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
无聊的剑心完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
云岫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
sun发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
ergou发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
禅明爱月完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
美丽乾完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
ks完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Plasmacas发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
陈chensc发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
HCl完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
哈11发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
h111完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
111发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
桐桐应助天成采纳,获得10
8秒前
balabla完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
丘比特应助江霸采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
Green Fire Retardants for Polymeric Materials 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7614284
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9189647
关于积分的说明 19690022
捐赠科研通 7187194
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3271119
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2434485
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2266062