Assessment of melanoma precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk information

医学 清晰 利克特量表 人口学 老年学 临床心理学 心理学 发展心理学 生物化学 化学 社会学
作者
John Charles A. Lacson,Stephanie M. Forgas,Scarlet H. Doyle,Qian Lü,Jocelyn Del Rio,Stella Valavanis,Rodrigo Carvajal,Guillermo González-Calderón,Young‐Chul Kim,Richard G. Roetzheim,Susan T. Vadaparampil,Peter A. Kanetsky
出处
期刊:Translational behavioral medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:12 (5): 683-687 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac034
摘要

Abstract Few studies have examined cognitive responses to mailed precision prevention materials. MC1R is a robust, well-described melanoma susceptibility marker. The purpose was to assess cognitive responses to generic or precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk. Non-Hispanic White participants (n = 1134) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial received either precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk (higher/average) or generic prevention (standard) materials. Six months after baseline, 808 (71.3%) participants reported on the amount of prevention materials read (5-point scale); believability and clarity of materials; intention to change preventive behaviors (7-point Likert scale); and recall of their MC1R genetic risk. Comparisons were conducted using Kruskal–Wallis and chi-squared tests. Overall, participants read most to all (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) of the prevention materials, reported high believability (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1) and clarity (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and moderate intention to change preventive behaviors (Mdn = 5, IQR = 2). Higher-risk participants reported slightly less clarity (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) than either average-risk (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1, p = 2.50 × 10−3) or standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = 2.30 × 10−5); and slightly less believability (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1) than standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = .005). Higher-risk participants were 2.21 times as likely (95% CI = 1.43–3.43) to misremember or forget their risk compared to average-risk participants; misremembering was observed only among higher-risk participants (14%). Mailed precision prevention information were mostly read, highly believable and clear, and resulted in moderate levels of intention to change sun protection behaviors, bolstering the feasibility of population-level precision prevention. Defensive reactions may explain lower clarity, believability, and higher incorrect risk recall among higher-risk participants.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
险胜发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
绵羊小姐完成签到,获得积分0
1秒前
1秒前
我是老大应助wise111采纳,获得10
2秒前
song完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
cdercder应助动听藏今采纳,获得10
4秒前
LaKI发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
SGZ完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
大模型应助Mollyxueyue采纳,获得50
11秒前
TOM龙发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
李爱国应助ZPK芜湖采纳,获得10
13秒前
wangmingyuan关注了科研通微信公众号
14秒前
14秒前
眼睛大的小熊猫完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Akim应助kakafan采纳,获得10
17秒前
刘刘刘完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
PC关闭了PC文献求助
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
淡定醉薇完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
22秒前
贺贺发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
24秒前
misha991发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
震动的宛秋完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
宁幼萱发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
26秒前
cdercder应助生生采纳,获得10
29秒前
wangmingyuan发布了新的文献求助20
29秒前
ZPK芜湖发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
30秒前
贺贺完成签到,获得积分20
32秒前
LaKI完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
33秒前
zhhhh发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
37秒前
38秒前
RATHER完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
Belinda发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Electrode Potentials 550
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Association of Reentry Well-Being with Psychological Distress, Employment, and Housing Instability 15-Months After Incarceration 500
Trees of tropical Asia : an illustrated guide to diversity 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7027724
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8698080
关于积分的说明 18429871
捐赠科研通 6527132
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3111505
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2188602
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2087055