Assessment of melanoma precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk information

医学 清晰 利克特量表 人口学 老年学 临床心理学 心理学 发展心理学 生物化学 化学 社会学
作者
John Charles A. Lacson,Stephanie M. Forgas,Scarlet H. Doyle,Qian Lü,Jocelyn Del Rio,Stella Valavanis,Rodrigo Carvajal,Guillermo González-Calderón,Young‐Chul Kim,Richard G. Roetzheim,Susan T. Vadaparampil,Peter A. Kanetsky
出处
期刊:Translational behavioral medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:12 (5): 683-687 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac034
摘要

Abstract Few studies have examined cognitive responses to mailed precision prevention materials. MC1R is a robust, well-described melanoma susceptibility marker. The purpose was to assess cognitive responses to generic or precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk. Non-Hispanic White participants (n = 1134) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial received either precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk (higher/average) or generic prevention (standard) materials. Six months after baseline, 808 (71.3%) participants reported on the amount of prevention materials read (5-point scale); believability and clarity of materials; intention to change preventive behaviors (7-point Likert scale); and recall of their MC1R genetic risk. Comparisons were conducted using Kruskal–Wallis and chi-squared tests. Overall, participants read most to all (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) of the prevention materials, reported high believability (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1) and clarity (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and moderate intention to change preventive behaviors (Mdn = 5, IQR = 2). Higher-risk participants reported slightly less clarity (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) than either average-risk (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1, p = 2.50 × 10−3) or standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = 2.30 × 10−5); and slightly less believability (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1) than standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = .005). Higher-risk participants were 2.21 times as likely (95% CI = 1.43–3.43) to misremember or forget their risk compared to average-risk participants; misremembering was observed only among higher-risk participants (14%). Mailed precision prevention information were mostly read, highly believable and clear, and resulted in moderate levels of intention to change sun protection behaviors, bolstering the feasibility of population-level precision prevention. Defensive reactions may explain lower clarity, believability, and higher incorrect risk recall among higher-risk participants.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
杭啊完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
YWKK发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
goog完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
dijla发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
loomi发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Orange应助杭啊采纳,获得10
6秒前
Preseverance完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Yezi发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
舒服的凡之完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
pos发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
呦呦完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
qingfeng发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
发一篇sci发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Owen应助坚定的晓灵采纳,获得10
14秒前
xcl发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
完美世界应助林较瘦采纳,获得10
15秒前
段落落应助ggg采纳,获得20
16秒前
我是老大应助qingfeng采纳,获得10
16秒前
付蓉完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
英姑应助幽默的羿采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
领导范儿应助杭啊采纳,获得10
19秒前
www完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
李春霞完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
完美世界应助寒月如雪采纳,获得10
23秒前
benben发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
jackvhennn发布了新的文献求助50
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1314
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7737035
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9286455
关于积分的说明 20178186
捐赠科研通 7314948
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3305473
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2457754
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2314923