Assessment of melanoma precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk information

医学 清晰 利克特量表 人口学 老年学 临床心理学 心理学 发展心理学 生物化学 化学 社会学
作者
John Charles A. Lacson,Stephanie M. Forgas,Scarlet H. Doyle,Qian Lü,Jocelyn Del Rio,Stella Valavanis,Rodrigo Carvajal,Guillermo González-Calderón,Young‐Chul Kim,Richard G. Roetzheim,Susan T. Vadaparampil,Peter A. Kanetsky
出处
期刊:Translational behavioral medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:12 (5): 683-687 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac034
摘要

Abstract Few studies have examined cognitive responses to mailed precision prevention materials. MC1R is a robust, well-described melanoma susceptibility marker. The purpose was to assess cognitive responses to generic or precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk. Non-Hispanic White participants (n = 1134) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial received either precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk (higher/average) or generic prevention (standard) materials. Six months after baseline, 808 (71.3%) participants reported on the amount of prevention materials read (5-point scale); believability and clarity of materials; intention to change preventive behaviors (7-point Likert scale); and recall of their MC1R genetic risk. Comparisons were conducted using Kruskal–Wallis and chi-squared tests. Overall, participants read most to all (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) of the prevention materials, reported high believability (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1) and clarity (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and moderate intention to change preventive behaviors (Mdn = 5, IQR = 2). Higher-risk participants reported slightly less clarity (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) than either average-risk (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1, p = 2.50 × 10−3) or standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = 2.30 × 10−5); and slightly less believability (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1) than standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = .005). Higher-risk participants were 2.21 times as likely (95% CI = 1.43–3.43) to misremember or forget their risk compared to average-risk participants; misremembering was observed only among higher-risk participants (14%). Mailed precision prevention information were mostly read, highly believable and clear, and resulted in moderate levels of intention to change sun protection behaviors, bolstering the feasibility of population-level precision prevention. Defensive reactions may explain lower clarity, believability, and higher incorrect risk recall among higher-risk participants.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
红叶完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
慕容誉完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
hgl发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
归尘应助聪慧的过客采纳,获得10
2秒前
乐乐应助成就的绯采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
稳重的傲芙完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
VanishX发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
rm发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Dlx完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
浩铭完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Jasper应助美满玉兰采纳,获得10
6秒前
Lucas应助谦让的芝采纳,获得10
7秒前
Momo007发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
山复尔尔完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
Hello应助hgl采纳,获得10
12秒前
成就的绯完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
淡淡士晋完成签到 ,获得积分20
13秒前
南农的king发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
Lee完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Z.zz完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
lau完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
港崽宝宝完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
活力的听露完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
Aurora发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
Cheng Yu发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Jasper应助lau采纳,获得10
22秒前
胡思完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
调皮的代双完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
陈永伟完成签到,获得积分0
23秒前
24秒前
嘻嘻嘻完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
刻苦羽毛完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
小二郎应助Ccc采纳,获得10
25秒前
儒雅水池完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to Helicopter and Tiltrotor Flight Simulation, Second Edition 2500
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6512657
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8306107
关于积分的说明 17744034
捐赠科研通 5614499
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2923811
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1901047
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1762754