Assessment of melanoma precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk information

医学 清晰 利克特量表 人口学 老年学 临床心理学 心理学 发展心理学 生物化学 化学 社会学
作者
John Charles A. Lacson,Stephanie M. Forgas,Scarlet H. Doyle,Qian Lü,Jocelyn Del Rio,Stella Valavanis,Rodrigo Carvajal,Guillermo González-Calderón,Young‐Chul Kim,Richard G. Roetzheim,Susan T. Vadaparampil,Peter A. Kanetsky
出处
期刊:Translational behavioral medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:12 (5): 683-687 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac034
摘要

Abstract Few studies have examined cognitive responses to mailed precision prevention materials. MC1R is a robust, well-described melanoma susceptibility marker. The purpose was to assess cognitive responses to generic or precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk. Non-Hispanic White participants (n = 1134) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial received either precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk (higher/average) or generic prevention (standard) materials. Six months after baseline, 808 (71.3%) participants reported on the amount of prevention materials read (5-point scale); believability and clarity of materials; intention to change preventive behaviors (7-point Likert scale); and recall of their MC1R genetic risk. Comparisons were conducted using Kruskal–Wallis and chi-squared tests. Overall, participants read most to all (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) of the prevention materials, reported high believability (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1) and clarity (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and moderate intention to change preventive behaviors (Mdn = 5, IQR = 2). Higher-risk participants reported slightly less clarity (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) than either average-risk (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1, p = 2.50 × 10−3) or standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = 2.30 × 10−5); and slightly less believability (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1) than standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = .005). Higher-risk participants were 2.21 times as likely (95% CI = 1.43–3.43) to misremember or forget their risk compared to average-risk participants; misremembering was observed only among higher-risk participants (14%). Mailed precision prevention information were mostly read, highly believable and clear, and resulted in moderate levels of intention to change sun protection behaviors, bolstering the feasibility of population-level precision prevention. Defensive reactions may explain lower clarity, believability, and higher incorrect risk recall among higher-risk participants.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
丰富达发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
李贾美完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
啦啦啦发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
DL关闭了DL文献求助
3秒前
飞快的大炮完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
杨光发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
香蕉觅云应助神雕001采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
hh完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助上冬采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
士艳完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
无心的水桃发布了新的文献求助150
10秒前
泡芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
XYX完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
空空完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
JimmyC完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
hani发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
15秒前
rueh发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
是个宝耶完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
OrangeLight完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Akim应助bababoi采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
生动汉堡发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
shicheng发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
小蘑菇应助夙夙采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Arthritis and Related Conditions, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7287753
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8907489
关于积分的说明 18851617
捐赠科研通 6956514
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3208711
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2378546
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2184481