Assessment of melanoma precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk information

医学 清晰 利克特量表 人口学 老年学 临床心理学 心理学 发展心理学 生物化学 社会学 化学
作者
John Charles A. Lacson,Stephanie M. Forgas,Scarlet H. Doyle,Qian Lü,Jocelyn Del Rio,Stella Valavanis,Rodrigo Carvajal,Guillermo González-Calderón,Young‐Chul Kim,Richard G. Roetzheim,Susan T. Vadaparampil,Peter A. Kanetsky
出处
期刊:Translational behavioral medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:12 (5): 683-687 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac034
摘要

Abstract Few studies have examined cognitive responses to mailed precision prevention materials. MC1R is a robust, well-described melanoma susceptibility marker. The purpose was to assess cognitive responses to generic or precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk. Non-Hispanic White participants (n = 1134) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial received either precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk (higher/average) or generic prevention (standard) materials. Six months after baseline, 808 (71.3%) participants reported on the amount of prevention materials read (5-point scale); believability and clarity of materials; intention to change preventive behaviors (7-point Likert scale); and recall of their MC1R genetic risk. Comparisons were conducted using Kruskal–Wallis and chi-squared tests. Overall, participants read most to all (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) of the prevention materials, reported high believability (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1) and clarity (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and moderate intention to change preventive behaviors (Mdn = 5, IQR = 2). Higher-risk participants reported slightly less clarity (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) than either average-risk (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1, p = 2.50 × 10−3) or standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = 2.30 × 10−5); and slightly less believability (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1) than standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = .005). Higher-risk participants were 2.21 times as likely (95% CI = 1.43–3.43) to misremember or forget their risk compared to average-risk participants; misremembering was observed only among higher-risk participants (14%). Mailed precision prevention information were mostly read, highly believable and clear, and resulted in moderate levels of intention to change sun protection behaviors, bolstering the feasibility of population-level precision prevention. Defensive reactions may explain lower clarity, believability, and higher incorrect risk recall among higher-risk participants.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
领导范儿应助12138采纳,获得10
刚刚
英姑应助SSY采纳,获得10
刚刚
doller应助子奇采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
丘比特应助大漏特漏采纳,获得10
2秒前
菲菲发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
东方半仙完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
豆豆豆豆发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
da完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
free发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
晚枫完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
SimplexLai发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
崔崔完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
科研通AI6.1应助微笑香薇采纳,获得10
5秒前
carinaaaa发布了新的文献求助100
5秒前
科目三应助佳烨采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
CYH完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Propitious完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
张智信完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
da发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
11秒前
香蕉觅云应助Aurora采纳,获得10
13秒前
麦奇发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Akim应助王亚奇采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
小学生库里完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
任性新儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
MIEMIE发布了新的文献求助20
18秒前
18秒前
volunteer完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
Hello应助爱爱精神境界采纳,获得10
20秒前
廖梦雨完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Metallurgy at high pressures and high temperatures 2000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
High Pressures-Temperatures Apparatus 1000
Free parameter models in liquid scintillation counting 1000
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
The Organic Chemistry of Biological Pathways Second Edition 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6323576
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8139957
关于积分的说明 17065586
捐赠科研通 5376624
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2853618
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1831289
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1682506