Assessment of melanoma precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk information

医学 清晰 利克特量表 人口学 老年学 临床心理学 心理学 发展心理学 生物化学 化学 社会学
作者
John Charles A. Lacson,Stephanie M. Forgas,Scarlet H. Doyle,Qian Lü,Jocelyn Del Rio,Stella Valavanis,Rodrigo Carvajal,Guillermo González-Calderón,Young‐Chul Kim,Richard G. Roetzheim,Susan T. Vadaparampil,Peter A. Kanetsky
出处
期刊:Translational behavioral medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:12 (5): 683-687 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac034
摘要

Abstract Few studies have examined cognitive responses to mailed precision prevention materials. MC1R is a robust, well-described melanoma susceptibility marker. The purpose was to assess cognitive responses to generic or precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk. Non-Hispanic White participants (n = 1134) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial received either precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk (higher/average) or generic prevention (standard) materials. Six months after baseline, 808 (71.3%) participants reported on the amount of prevention materials read (5-point scale); believability and clarity of materials; intention to change preventive behaviors (7-point Likert scale); and recall of their MC1R genetic risk. Comparisons were conducted using Kruskal–Wallis and chi-squared tests. Overall, participants read most to all (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) of the prevention materials, reported high believability (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1) and clarity (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and moderate intention to change preventive behaviors (Mdn = 5, IQR = 2). Higher-risk participants reported slightly less clarity (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) than either average-risk (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1, p = 2.50 × 10−3) or standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = 2.30 × 10−5); and slightly less believability (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1) than standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = .005). Higher-risk participants were 2.21 times as likely (95% CI = 1.43–3.43) to misremember or forget their risk compared to average-risk participants; misremembering was observed only among higher-risk participants (14%). Mailed precision prevention information were mostly read, highly believable and clear, and resulted in moderate levels of intention to change sun protection behaviors, bolstering the feasibility of population-level precision prevention. Defensive reactions may explain lower clarity, believability, and higher incorrect risk recall among higher-risk participants.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
细腻的芷文完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
游一发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
心灵美鑫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
天天快乐应助niniyiya采纳,获得10
2秒前
烂漫白昼发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
shell完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
张123完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
平淡的宛秋应助仙林AK47采纳,获得20
4秒前
li完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
lyyyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
传奇3应助桃之夭夭采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
浪子驳回了dde应助
9秒前
七月晴发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
梦中学习完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
天天发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
领导范儿应助微笑访卉采纳,获得10
10秒前
yeee发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
热情的黑猫应助Demo采纳,获得10
11秒前
hhhh关注了科研通微信公众号
11秒前
12秒前
cdercder应助chi1采纳,获得10
13秒前
Wonder罗发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
lyyyyyy完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Xiaoyu发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
高赛文发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 5000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
Blackwell's five-minute veterinary consult clinical companion: small animal gastrointestinal diseases 500
Data book on fatigue strength of metallic materials 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7563751
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9144268
关于积分的说明 19552237
捐赠科研通 7151262
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3262390
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2428640
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2252109