Assessment of melanoma precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk information

医学 清晰 利克特量表 人口学 老年学 临床心理学 心理学 发展心理学 生物化学 化学 社会学
作者
John Charles A. Lacson,Stephanie M. Forgas,Scarlet H. Doyle,Qian Lü,Jocelyn Del Rio,Stella Valavanis,Rodrigo Carvajal,Guillermo González-Calderón,Young‐Chul Kim,Richard G. Roetzheim,Susan T. Vadaparampil,Peter A. Kanetsky
出处
期刊:Translational behavioral medicine [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:12 (5): 683-687 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac034
摘要

Abstract Few studies have examined cognitive responses to mailed precision prevention materials. MC1R is a robust, well-described melanoma susceptibility marker. The purpose was to assess cognitive responses to generic or precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk. Non-Hispanic White participants (n = 1134) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial received either precision prevention materials incorporating MC1R genetic risk (higher/average) or generic prevention (standard) materials. Six months after baseline, 808 (71.3%) participants reported on the amount of prevention materials read (5-point scale); believability and clarity of materials; intention to change preventive behaviors (7-point Likert scale); and recall of their MC1R genetic risk. Comparisons were conducted using Kruskal–Wallis and chi-squared tests. Overall, participants read most to all (Mdn = 4, IQR = 2) of the prevention materials, reported high believability (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1) and clarity (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1), and moderate intention to change preventive behaviors (Mdn = 5, IQR = 2). Higher-risk participants reported slightly less clarity (Mdn = 6, IQR = 2) than either average-risk (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1, p = 2.50 × 10−3) or standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = 2.30 × 10−5); and slightly less believability (Mdn = 6, IQR = 1) than standard participants (Mdn = 7, IQR = 1, p = .005). Higher-risk participants were 2.21 times as likely (95% CI = 1.43–3.43) to misremember or forget their risk compared to average-risk participants; misremembering was observed only among higher-risk participants (14%). Mailed precision prevention information were mostly read, highly believable and clear, and resulted in moderate levels of intention to change sun protection behaviors, bolstering the feasibility of population-level precision prevention. Defensive reactions may explain lower clarity, believability, and higher incorrect risk recall among higher-risk participants.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
默默莫莫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
zhiyang完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
拾叁完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
愉快惮应助Hh采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
12121发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
周周完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
cf完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
桑榆发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
BOBO发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
懒大王发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
科研通AI6.4应助星之宇痕采纳,获得10
17秒前
胡萝卜完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
小蘑菇应助julia采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
Magic完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
可爱的函函应助Gjjjjjjj采纳,获得10
19秒前
鹿七发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
Hello应助哈哈哈哈采纳,获得10
20秒前
桐桐应助Tolerance采纳,获得10
20秒前
在水一方应助左丘世立采纳,获得10
21秒前
峰峰发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
科研通AI2S应助太阳当空照采纳,获得30
22秒前
23秒前
迅速语风发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
小资发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
颂颂发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
27秒前
27秒前
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 530
Lengua e imagen en la comunicación digital 500
A First Course in Options Pricing Theory 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7482120
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9074820
关于积分的说明 19353134
捐赠科研通 7098171
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3247773
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2416758
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2233121