Veno‐arteriovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation—A single center experience

Patients with combined circulatory shock and respiratory failure may benefit from veno-arteriovenous (V-AV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ECMO). We report our center's experience with V-AV ECMO and propose an algorithm to help identify patients that may benefit from early V-AV ECMO support.Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records between November 1, 2016 and November 1, 2019.Out of a total of 369 patients placed on extracorporeal life support (ECLS), we identified a total of 26 patients who underwent hybrid ECMO placement. Three patients were excluded from our analysis due to veno-venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-VA ECMO) configuration, therefore 23 patients were included in our analysis. The median age was 53 (range 25-73) years. Hybrid ECMO support was instituted most commonly for differential hypoxemia in patients on venoarterial (V-A) ECMO support, and cardiogenic shock in patients who were initially started on venovenous (V-V) ECMO. The initial ECMO cannulation was V-A in 12 patients, V-V in 8 patients, and directly V-AV in 3 patients. Nine out of 23 patients were successfully decannulated (39.1%) and survived until hospital discharge. The main ECMO-related complications included bleeding (n = 10), circuit exchange either due to hemolysis or oxygenator failure (n = 4), ECMO cannula site infection (n = 2), deep venous thrombosis (n = 2), and death during ECMO cannula exchange (n = 1).V-AV ECMO represents a rescue strategy in critically ill patients with combined respiratory failure and cardio-circulatory shock.