富维斯特朗
帕博西利布
医学
安慰剂
转移性乳腺癌
内科学
肿瘤科
乳腺癌
癌症
雌激素受体
病理
替代医学
作者
Joan Albanell,María Teresa Martínez,Manuel Ramos,M. O’Connor,Luis de la Cruz‐Merino,Ana Santaballa,Noelia Martínez-Jáñez,Fernando Moreno,Isaura Fernández,Jesús Alarcón,Juan Antonio Virizuela,Juan de la Haba-Rodríguez,Pedro Sánchez‐Rovira,Lucía González‐Cortijo,Mireia Margelí Vila,Alfonso Sánchez‐Muñoz,A. Antón,M. Casas,Susana Bezares,Federico Rojo
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.010
摘要
BackgroundThe potential benefit of adding palbociclib to fulvestrant as first-line treatment in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative endocrine-sensitive advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients remains uncharacterized.Patients and methodsIn this randomized (1:1), double-blind, phase II study, postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative ABC with de novo metastatic disease or those who relapsed after >12 months of adjuvant endocrine therapy received palbociclib/fulvestrant or placebo/fulvestrant. Stratification was based on recurrent versus de novo metastatic disease and visceral involvement. The primary objective was one-year progression-free survival (PFS-1y) rate. The sample size was 190 patients. The two-sided alpha of 0.2, 80% of power to detect a difference between the arms, assuming PFS rates of 0.695 and 0.545 for palbociclib/fulvestrant and placebo/fulvestrant, respectively.ResultsIn total, 189 patients were randomized to palbociclib/fulvestrant ([n = 94] or placebo/fulvestrant [n = 95]). 45.5% and 60.3% of patients had de novo metastatic disease and visceral involvement, respectively. PFS-1y rates were 83.5% and 71.9% in the palbociclib/fulvestrant and placebo/fulvestrant arms, (HR 0.55, 80% CI 0.36–0.83, P = 0.064). The median PFS were 31.8 and 22.0 months for the palbociclib/fulvestrant and placebo/fulvestrant arms (aHR 0.48, 80% CI 0.37–0.64, P = 0.001).The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (68.1% vs. 0%), leucopenia (26.6% vs. 0%), anemia (3.2% vs. 0%), and lymphopenia (14.9% vs. 2.1%) for the palbociclib/fulvestrant and placebo/fulvestrant, respectively. The most frequent non-hematologic grade 3–4 adverse event was fatigue (4.3% vs. 0%).ConclusionsPalbociclib/fulvestrant demonstrated better PFS-1y rates and median PFS than placebo/fulvestrant in HR-positive/HER2-negative endocrine-sensitive ABC patients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI