神经反射
荟萃分析
随机对照试验
医学
脑电图
慢性疼痛
置信区间
止痛药
物理医学与康复
麻醉
物理疗法
内科学
精神科
作者
Negin Hesam‐Shariati,Wei‐Ju Chang,Michael A. Wewege,James H. McAuley,Andrew Booth,Zina Trost,Chin‐Teng Lin,Toby Newton‐John,Sylvia M. Gustin
摘要
Electroencephalographic (EEG) neurofeedback has been utilized to regulate abnormal brain activity associated with chronic pain.In this systematic review, we synthesized the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of EEG neurofeedback on chronic pain using random effects meta-analyses. Additionally, we performed a narrative review to explore the results of non-randomized studies. The quality of included studies was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tools, and the GRADE system was used to rate the certainty of evidence.Ten RCTs and 13 non-randomized studies were included. The primary meta-analysis on nine eligible RCTs indicated that although there is low confidence, EEG neurofeedback may have a clinically meaningful effect on pain intensity in short-term. Removing the studies with high risk of bias from the primary meta-analysis resulted in moderate confidence that there remained a clinically meaningful effect on pain intensity. We could not draw any conclusion from the findings of non-randomized studies, as they were mostly non-comparative trials or explorative case series. However, the extracted data indicated that the neurofeedback protocols in both RCTs and non-randomized studies mainly involved the conventional EEG neurofeedback approach, which targeted reinforcing either alpha or sensorimotor rhythms and suppressing theta and/or beta bands on one brain region at a time. A posthoc analysis of RCTs utilizing the conventional approach resulted in a clinically meaningful effect estimate for pain intensity.Although there is promising evidence on the analgesic effect of EEG neurofeedback, further studies with larger sample sizes and higher quality of evidence are required.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI