急性呼吸窘迫综合征
医学
重症监护医学
高原压力
通风(建筑)
机械通风
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
潮气量
急性呼吸窘迫
弥漫性肺泡损伤
呼吸生理学
作者
Chiara Mega,Irene Cavalli,Vito Marco Ranieri,Tommaso Tonetti
出处
期刊:Current Opinion in Critical Care
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2021-11-22
卷期号:Publish Ahead of Print
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1097/mcc.0000000000000904
摘要
To review current evidence on the pathophysiology of COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and on the implementation of lung protective ventilation.Although multiple observations and physiological studies seem to show a different pathophysiological behaviour in COVID-19-ARDS compared with 'classical' ARDS, numerous studies on thousands of patients do not confirm these findings and COVID-19-ARDS indeed shares similar characteristics and interindividual heterogeneity with ARDS from other causes. Although still scarce, present evidence on the application of lung protective ventilation in COVID-19-ARDS shows that it is indeed consistently applied in ICUs worldwide with a possible signal towards better survival at least in one study. The levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) usually applied in these patients are higher than in 'classical' ARDS, proposing once again the issue of PEEP personalization in hypoxemic patients. In the absence of robust evidence, careful evaluation of the patient is needed, and empiric settings should be oriented towards lower levels of PEEP.According to the present evidence, a lung protective strategy based on low tidal volume and plateau pressures is indicated in COVID-19-ARDS as in ARDS from other causes; however, there are still uncertainties on the appropriate levels of PEEP.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI