已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

A Randomized, Prospective, Comparison Study of a Mixture of Acacia Fiber, Psyllium Fiber, and Fructose vs Polyethylene Glycol 3350 with Electrolytes for the Treatment of Chronic Functional Constipation in Childhood

医学 PEG比率 便秘 泻药 胃肠病学 前瞻性队列研究 不利影响 功能性便秘 内科学 随机对照试验 木虱 排便 外科 膳食纤维 化学 经济 食品科学 财务
作者
Paolo Quitadamo,Paola Coccorullo,Eleonora Giannetti,Claudio Romano,Andrea Chiaro,Angelo Campanozzi,Emanuela Poli,Salvatore Cucchiara,Giovanni Di Nardo,Annamaria Staiano
出处
期刊:The Journal of Pediatrics [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:161 (4): 710-715.e1 被引量:44
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.04.043
摘要

Objectives To compare the effectiveness of a mixture of acacia fiber, psyllium fiber, and fructose (AFPFF) with polyethylene glycol 3350 combined with electrolytes (PEG+E) in the treatment of children with chronic functional constipation (CFC); and to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of AFPFF in the treatment of children with CFC. Study design This was a randomized, open label, prospective, controlled, parallel-group study involving 100 children (M/F: 38/62; mean age ± SD: 6.5 ± 2.7 years) who were diagnosed with CFC according to the Rome III Criteria. Children were randomly divided into 2 groups: 50 children received AFPFF (16.8 g daily) and 50 children received PEG+E (0.5 g/kg daily) for 8 weeks. Primary outcome measures were frequency of bowel movements, stool consistency, fecal incontinence, and improvement of other associated gastrointestinal symptoms. Safety was assessed with evaluation of clinical adverse effects and growth measurements. Results Compliance rates were 72% for AFPFF and 96% for PEG+E. A significant improvement of constipation was seen in both groups. After 8 weeks, 77.8% of children treated with AFPFF and 83% of children treated with PEG+E had improved (P = .788). Neither PEG+E nor AFPFF caused any clinically significant side effects during the entire course of the study period. Conclusions In this randomized study, we did not find any significant difference between the efficacy of AFPFF and PEG+E in the treatment of children with CFC. Both medications were proved to be safe for CFC treatment, but PEG+E was better accepted by children. To compare the effectiveness of a mixture of acacia fiber, psyllium fiber, and fructose (AFPFF) with polyethylene glycol 3350 combined with electrolytes (PEG+E) in the treatment of children with chronic functional constipation (CFC); and to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of AFPFF in the treatment of children with CFC. This was a randomized, open label, prospective, controlled, parallel-group study involving 100 children (M/F: 38/62; mean age ± SD: 6.5 ± 2.7 years) who were diagnosed with CFC according to the Rome III Criteria. Children were randomly divided into 2 groups: 50 children received AFPFF (16.8 g daily) and 50 children received PEG+E (0.5 g/kg daily) for 8 weeks. Primary outcome measures were frequency of bowel movements, stool consistency, fecal incontinence, and improvement of other associated gastrointestinal symptoms. Safety was assessed with evaluation of clinical adverse effects and growth measurements. Compliance rates were 72% for AFPFF and 96% for PEG+E. A significant improvement of constipation was seen in both groups. After 8 weeks, 77.8% of children treated with AFPFF and 83% of children treated with PEG+E had improved (P = .788). Neither PEG+E nor AFPFF caused any clinically significant side effects during the entire course of the study period. In this randomized study, we did not find any significant difference between the efficacy of AFPFF and PEG+E in the treatment of children with CFC. Both medications were proved to be safe for CFC treatment, but PEG+E was better accepted by children.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
zzy完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
辛夷发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
only完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
江姜酱先生完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Jasonjoey发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小真白发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
aldehyde应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
7秒前
7秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
清欢完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Li发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Jasonjoey完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
天天快乐应助Li采纳,获得10
18秒前
大个应助悠悠我心采纳,获得30
19秒前
小冠军完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
21秒前
害羞便当完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
情怀应助小刘采纳,获得10
22秒前
zhouleiwang发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
斯文败类应助bing采纳,获得10
24秒前
大胆灵竹发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
30秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助sigrid采纳,获得10
33秒前
完美世界应助淡定的半梦采纳,获得10
36秒前
ding应助很好采纳,获得10
36秒前
bing发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
39秒前
弧光完成签到 ,获得积分0
39秒前
bing完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
HLZ发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der linguistischen Forschung 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3989989
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3532034
关于积分的说明 11256053
捐赠科研通 3270900
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1805105
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882270
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809216