Earthquake perception data highlight natural frequency details of Italian buildings

As the distance from an earthquake increases, the percentage of people who do not feel it also increases. The average transition distance between “felt” and “not felt” reports is mainly determined by the magnitude and depth of the earthquake, but it also depends on the observation floor and building height. Buildings act as resonators and can amplify the shaking at specific frequencies. We analyzed over 286,000 crowdsourced reports to study the effect of floor and building height on earthquake perception. We found that, compared to average values, there is an increase in the percentage of “felt” reports on the highest floors and a decrease in the lowest floors of buildings of all heights. We determined the range within which an observer is likely to feel an earthquake (perception boundary) and examined how it varies with magnitude. We found that as the building height increases, people on higher floors perceive medium to high magnitude earthquakes progressively better than lower magnitude ones. We compared the perception boundary with a model of seismic response spectra to estimate the vibration frequency perceived by observers on each floor/building height combination. Our results show that the value of the fundamental period increases with building height for the top floor, and that higher vibration modes become more evident for buildings with more than 6 stories. In addition, we observed that the height of the building also affects the vibration of the basement, with the frequency tending to decrease as the building height increases. Concerning macroseismic intensity estimation, we show that in tall buildings, observations made on both the upper and lower floors must be considered outside the normal range, and that earthquake perception also changes as a function of magnitude and distance, pointing out the importance of collecting an adequate number of observations to sample different locations of observers.