Biomechanical comparison of composite and cadaveric humeri models in experiments on operated humeral shaft fractures

A study was undertaken to determine how well contacting fracture fragments of composite bone replicated the behavior of fracture fragments in real bone. Ten composite and ten real humeral diaphyses were transected and reconstructed with limited-contact dynamic-compression plates. Two screws were placed on each side of the transection site and a calibrated electronic sensor sheet was placed between the imitated fracture fragments. After insertion of the distal screws, pressure measurements were made during insertion of the first proximal screw in compression mode, during insertion of the second screw in compression mode after loosening the first screw, and finally after retightening the first screw. The process was repeated after bending the plate. The contact area, the net compression force and the average compressive stress were computed and statistically compared. The composite bone and cadaveric bone differed in contact area and compressive stress but not in net compressive force. Plate bending did not produce a significant difference between composite and cadaveric bone. The results indicate that composite bone does not reproduce all the local fracture fragment conditions so that hardware testing in composite bone should proceed carefully. A gap between fracture fragments as is often used in comminuted fracture tests may remain as the most appropriate situation for fracture hardware testing.