医学
乳腺癌
随机对照试验
核医学
放射治疗
随机误差
交叉研究
人口
癌症
外科
数学
内科学
病理
统计
替代医学
环境卫生
安慰剂
作者
Jørund Graadal Svestad,Mojgan Heydari,Stine Gyland Mikalsen,Vidar G. Flote,Fredrik Nordby,Taran Paulsen Hellebust
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.017
摘要
Background and purpose To prospectively investigate whether surface guided setup of right sided breast cancer patients can increase efficiency and accuracy compared to traditional skin marker/tattoo based setup. Material and methods Twenty-five patients were included in this study. Each patient was positioned using skin marks and tattoos (procedure A) for half of the fractions and surface guidance using AlignRT (procedure B) for the other half of the fractions. The order of the two procedures was randomized. Pretreatment CBCT was acquired at every fraction for both setup procedures. A total of ten time points were recorded during every treatment session. Applied couch shifts after CBCT match were recorded and used for potential error calculations if no CBCT had been used. Results In the vertical direction procedure B showed significant smaller population based systematic (Ʃ) and random (σ) errors. However, a significant larger systematic error on the individual patient level (M) was also shown. This was found to be due to patient relaxation between setup and CBCT matching. Procedure B also showed a significant smaller random error in the lateral direction, while no significant differences were seen in the longitudinal direction. No significant difference in setup time was found between the two procedures. Conclusion Setup of right sided breast cancer patients using surface guidance yields higher accuracy than setup using skin marks/tattoos and lasers with the same setup time. Patient alignment for this patient group can safely be done without the use of permanent tattoos and skin marks when utilizing surface-guided patient positioning. However, CBCT should still be used as final setup verification.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI