心理干预
荟萃分析
代理(统计)
医疗保健
心理学
随机对照试验
批判性评价
梅德林
心理信息
置信区间
护理部
医学
替代医学
政治学
内科学
法学
外科
病理
机器学习
计算机科学
经济
经济增长
作者
Minghui Tan,Siyuan Tang,Shelli Feder,Jinnan Xiao,Chongmei Huang,Angus Cook,Claire E. Johnson,Jinfeng Ding
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104778
摘要
Advance care planning is recommended as part of standard medical services. Readiness, denoting stages of behavior change, exerts a substantial influence on its uptake. However, the characteristics and impacts of advance care planning interventions on readiness are not well-established. We systematically reviewed and conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of advance care planning interventions on readiness. Studies were appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. Meta-analyses were performed using mean difference of continuous variables or risk ratios of binary variables and their 95 % confidence interval as the pooled effect sizes. Eight studies were included in this review and were all rated low quality. Meta-analysis showed that interventions resulted in slight improvement in overall readiness (Mean Difference = 0.19, 95 % Confidence Interval: 0.02–0.36) for advance care planning. However, statistically significant effects of interventions were not identified for readiness in relation to specific behaviors (appointment of a health care proxy, talking to a health care proxy, talking to a medical practitioner about living wills, and signing a living will). Our meta-analyses demonstrated that interventions can improve the overall readiness for advance care planning, suggesting the necessity to integrate readiness into future health policies and clinical practices. Nevertheless, the absence of significant effects on specific behavioral readiness underscores the requirement for additional refinement in intervention design, advanced technologies, and theoretical foundations. Not registered.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI