卢比罗斯通
医学
安慰剂
便秘
内科学
胃肠病学
不利影响
功能性便秘
随机对照试验
临床终点
恶心
慢性便秘
病理
替代医学
作者
Ying Xiao,Ning Dai,Dan Zhang,De An Tian,Si De Liu,Zibin Tian,Xiaoyan Wang,Yanqing Li,Xiao Hua Hou,Xiucai Fang,Zhi Li Wen,Wei-Zheng Zeng,Hong Xu,Ming-jun Sun,Yu Lan Liu,Yong Wu,Xi Zhong Shen,Xiao Wei Liu,De Liang Liu,Minhu Chen
标识
DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.13058
摘要
Objectives Functional constipation is a gastrointestinal disorder prevalent around the world. Lubiprostone is the first locally acting type‐2 chloride channel activator to be used for treating constipation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lubiprostone in Chinese adults with functional constipation. Methods This was a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Patients with functional constipation were randomized to receive either lubiprostone (24 mcg twice daily) or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary end‐point was the frequency of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) during the first week of treatment. The secondary end‐points included the median time of the first SBM, SBM frequency at weeks 2, 3 and 4, weekly response rate of SBMs, the stool consistency score and average number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) per week. Results In total, 259 patients were randomized, with 130 in the lubiprostone group and 129 in the placebo group. SBM frequency was higher in the lubiprostone group (4.88 ± 4.09/wk) than that in the placebo group (3.22 ± 2.01/wk) at week 1 ( P < 0.0001). SBM frequency was also higher in the lubiprostone group at weeks 2, 3 and 4. The average number of CSBMs and the stool consistency score in the lubiprostone group were significantly higher than that in the placebo group at each week. No drug‐related serious adverse events (AEs) occurred. The most commonly reported AE was nausea. Conclusion Lubiprostone was superior to placebo in treating Chinese patients with functional constipation, together with good safety profile.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI