医学
接收机工作特性
内科学
慢性阻塞性肺病
诊断试验中的似然比
曲线下面积
优势比
置信区间
诊断优势比
恶化
回顾性队列研究
作者
Xu Hu,Wenhao Cai,Dan Xu,Dan Li,Fang Chen,M Chen,Y. Wu,Yongchun Shen
标识
DOI:10.5588/ijtld.24.0252
摘要
<sec><title>BACKGROUND</title>This study aimed to investigate the overall prognostic performance of the DECAF (dyspnoea, eosinopenia, consolidation, acidaemia, atrial fibrillation) score for in-hospital death in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) through a retrospective cohort study and an updated meta-analysis.</sec><sec><title>METHODS</title>Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive performance of DECAF were analysed, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) as criteria for accuracy. A literature search was performed in databases. The summary ROC (SROC) curve was used to assess the overall performance of the DECAF score.</sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title>Twenty-three non-survivors and 292 survivors of AECOPD were included. At a cut-off value of 1.5, DECAF scores showed good sensitivity (78.3%), low specificity (55.1%), and AUC (0.719, 95% CI 0.614–0.824). Additionally, 22 studies (including our study) with 824 non-survivors and 8,957 survivors were included in this meta-analysis. The summary estimates were listed as follows: sensitivity 0.77 (95% CI 0.69–0.83); specificity 0.76 (95% CI 0.67–0.85); positive likelihood ratio 3.2 (95% CI 2.4–4.3); negative likelihood ratio 0.31 (95% CI 0.23–0.40); and diagnostic odds ratio 10.00 (95% CI 7–16). The AUC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79–0.86).</sec><sec><title>CONCLUSIONS</title>The DECAF score is a simple tool to predict mortality in hospitalised patients with AECOPD, and the results of this study should be further validated.</sec>
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI