DWI lesions after intracranial aneurysm treatment with contour or WEB—does the device matter?

Objective In this study, we report our experience with the occurrence of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesions following aneurysm treatment with Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device and Contour Neurovascular System in elective settings. We compared both techniques in a retrospective single-center analysis, to investigate whether there are significant differences in the incidence of microemboli depending on the device used. Materials and methods Sixty-two cases treated with Contour were retrospectively compared with 84 WEB cases. Postinterventional MRI was performed in all patients within five days after the angiographic procedure. Only DWI lesions in the dependent vascular territory of the treated aneurysm were considered. Data on occurrence of DWI lesions, device implantation times as well as device change or repositions maneuvers were compared. Results A total of 146 patients were included in this study. Postinterventional DWI lesions were detected in 33 of the 62 (53.2%) Contour cases and in 36 of the 84 (42.8%) WEB cases with an average lesion number of 1.70 ± 3.45 in our WEB group and 1.68 ± 2.53 in our Contour cohort. Neither periinterventional device changes nor device reposition maneuvers had a significant impact on the occurrence of DWI lesions. Although four patients experienced transient neurological deterioration, the DWI lesions were not clinically relevant at the time of discharge, as the patients’ NIHSS remained stable compared to the preintervention NIHSS in the entire cohort. There was no statistically significant difference between the implantation times of WEB and Contour, although Contour could be implanted slightly faster. Conclusion Aneurysm treatment with WEB or Contour results in a comparable numbers of procedure-related DWI lesions. This effect was consistent after adjustment for other demographic or technical variables.