Mahdi Moqri,Chiara Herzog,Jesse R. Poganik,Kejun Ying,Jamie N. Justice,Daniel W. Belsky,Albert Higgins‐Chen,Brian H. Chen,Alan A. Cohen,Georg Fuellen,Sara Hägg,Riccardo E. Marioni,Martin Widschwendter,Kristen Fortney,П. О. Федичев,Alex Zhavoronkov,Nir Barzilai,Jessica Lasky‐Su,Douglas P. Kiel,Brian K. Kennedy
出处
期刊:Nature Medicine [Nature Portfolio] 日期:2024-02-01卷期号:30 (2): 360-372被引量:106
The search for biomarkers that quantify biological aging (particularly 'omic'-based biomarkers) has intensified in recent years. Such biomarkers could predict aging-related outcomes and could serve as surrogate endpoints for the evaluation of interventions promoting healthy aging and longevity. However, no consensus exists on how biomarkers of aging should be validated before their translation to the clinic. Here, we review current efforts to evaluate the predictive validity of omic biomarkers of aging in population studies, discuss challenges in comparability and generalizability and provide recommendations to facilitate future validation of biomarkers of aging. Finally, we discuss how systematic validation can accelerate clinical translation of biomarkers of aging and their use in gerotherapeutic clinical trials.