Risk-Adapted Cutoffs in Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Immunochemical Tests

医学 结肠镜检查 结直肠癌 切断 内科学 队列 胃肠病学 风险因素 风险评估 弗雷明翰风险评分 腺瘤 肿瘤科 癌症 疾病 计算机安全 量子力学 计算机科学 物理
作者
Lincai Peng,Yesilda Balavarca,Tobias Niedermaier,Korbinian Weigl,Michael Hoffmeister,Hermann Brenner
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [American College of Gastroenterology]
卷期号:115 (7): 1110-1116 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000579
摘要

INTRODUCTION: Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin are increasingly used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The use of uniform positivity thresholds (cutoffs) within screening populations is expected to imply lower positive predictive values (PPVs) and higher numbers of colonoscopies needed (numbers needed to scope [NNSs]) to detect advanced neoplasms among screening participants at lower risk compared with those at higher risk. We aimed to assess such variation and its potential implications in a large screening cohort. METHODS: A quantitative FIT (FOB Gold; Sentinel Diagnostics, Milan, Italy) was conducted in fecal samples collected by 4,332 participants of screening colonoscopy before bowel preparation. Participants were classified into 3 risk groups (low, medium, and high) by tertiles of a previously derived risk-factor-based risk score. We determined the variation of PPVs and NNSs for detecting advanced neoplasms (i.e., CRC or advanced adenoma) when using the same FIT cutoffs and variation of FIT cutoffs that would yield uniform PPVs across risk groups. RESULTS: When a fixed FIT cutoff of 10 μg/g was used, the PPV increased from 23.3% to 41.8% from the low- to the high-risk group, with NNS decreasing from 4.3 to 2.4 ( P < 0.001). Similar variations of PPVs and NNSs across risk groups were observed at higher FIT cutoffs. When risk group-specific cutoffs were defined to achieve fixed PPVs of 25%, 30%, and 35% across all risk groups, cutoffs varied from 5.3 to 11.4, 6.5 to 18.7, and 7.5 to 31.0 μg hemoglobin/g feces, respectively, between high- and low-risk groups ( P < 0.05 for all differences). DISCUSSION: Using risk-adapted cutoffs may help to achieve target levels of PPV and NNS and might be an option to consider for personalized FIT-based CRC screening.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
柳沧海完成签到,获得积分0
刚刚
lls发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
chaozihao完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
科研通AI6应助ZHH采纳,获得10
5秒前
Kz发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
失眠振家完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
弎夜完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
充电宝应助lipanpan采纳,获得10
9秒前
风趣的碧琴完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
牵着猴子晒月亮完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Hilda007应助PhD采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
唯梦发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
汉堡包应助潇洒映冬采纳,获得10
19秒前
yorktang发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
搜集达人应助科研小白采纳,获得10
21秒前
嘿嘿完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
玻色子完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
22秒前
十三驳回了英姑应助
22秒前
jyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
25秒前
z549326399完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
25秒前
自由冬亦完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
liu发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
WSQ发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
jason发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
玻色子发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
wangzhen完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
moonlight完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
科研通AI2S应助林药师采纳,获得10
31秒前
32秒前
群山发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Third edition 2025 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Beyond the sentence : discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Reliability Monitoring Program 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5339290
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4476138
关于积分的说明 13930647
捐赠科研通 4371604
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2401978
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1394933
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1366848