亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Logistics Performance, Ratings, and Its Impact on Customer Purchasing Behavior and Sales in E-Commerce Platforms

采购 业务 交付性能 客户保留 营销 服务(商务) 电子商务 顾客满意度 服务质量 产品(数学) 计算机科学 过程管理 几何学 数学 万维网
作者
Vinayak Deshpande,Pradeep K. Pendem
出处
期刊:Manufacturing & Service Operations Management [Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences]
卷期号:25 (3): 827-845 被引量:102
标识
DOI:10.1287/msom.2021.1045
摘要

Problem definition: We examine the impact of logistics performance metrics such as delivery time and customer’s requested delivery speed on logistics service ratings and third-party sellers’ sales on an e-commerce platform. Academic/practical relevance: Although e-commerce retailers like Amazon have recently invested heavily in their logistics networks to provide faster delivery to customers, there is scant academic literature that tests and quantifies the premise that convenient and fast delivery will drive sales. In this paper, we provide empirical evidence on whether this relationship holds in practice by analyzing a mechanism that connects delivery performance to sales through logistics ratings. Prior academic work on online ratings in e-commerce platforms has mostly analyzed customers’ response to product functional performance and biases that exist within. Our study contributes to this stream of literature by examining customer experience from a service quality perspective by analyzing logistics service performance, logistics ratings, and its impact on customer purchase probability and sales. Methodology: Using an extensive data set of more than 15 million customer orders on the Tmall platform and Cainiao network (logistics arm of Alibaba), we use the Heckman ordered regression model to explain the variation in customers’ rating of logistics performance and the likelihood of customers posting a logistics rating. Next, we develop a generic customer choice model that links the customer’s likelihood of making a purchase to the logistics ratings provided by prior customers. We implement a two-step estimation of the choice model to quantify the impact of logistics ratings on customer purchase probability and third-party seller sales. Results: We surprisingly find that even customers with no promise on delivery speed are likely to post lower logistics ratings for delivery times longer than two days. Although these customers are not promised an explicit delivery deadline, they seem to have a mental threshold of two days and expect deliveries to be made within that time. Similarly, we find that priority customers (those with two-day and one-day promise speed) provide lower logistics ratings for delivery times longer than their anticipated delivery date. We estimate that reducing the delivery time of all three-day delivered orders on this platform (which makeup [Formula: see text] 35% of the total orders) to two days would improve the average daily third-party seller sales by 13.3% on this platform. The impact of delivery time performance on sales is more significant for sellers with a higher percentage of three-day delivered orders and a higher spend per order. Managerial implications: Our study emphasizes that delivery performance and logistics ratings, which measure service quality, are essential drivers of the customer purchase decision on e-commerce platforms. Furthermore, by quantifying the impact of delivery time performance on sales, our study also provides a framework for online retailers to assess if the increase in sales because of improved logistics performance can offset the increase in additional infrastructure costs required for faster deliveries. Our study’s insights are relevant to third-party sellers and e-commerce platform managers who aim to improve long-term online customer traffic and sales. History: This paper has been accepted as part of the 2018 MSOM Data Driven Research Challenge. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.1045 .
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
斯文败类应助科研启动采纳,获得10
刚刚
liu完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
ys完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
热心的尔岚完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
daomaihu完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
科研通AI6.4应助Li采纳,获得30
26秒前
34秒前
bkagyin应助ranqiang采纳,获得10
36秒前
xia完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
MchemG应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
58秒前
1分钟前
yubaobao完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研启动发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
一辰不染完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
caca完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
Li发布了新的文献求助30
1分钟前
科目三应助小巧的怀蝶采纳,获得10
1分钟前
月满西楼完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
WSND发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
王佳怡发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
科研通AI6.2应助WSND采纳,获得10
2分钟前
何同学完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
无私的遥发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
Sunvo完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
zzzwhy发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
WSND发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
王佳怡发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
LeoYiS214完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
雷玉娇完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
李健的粉丝团团长应助WSND采纳,获得10
2分钟前
MchemG应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7496528
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9087489
关于积分的说明 19382639
捐赠科研通 7107508
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3250024
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2419496
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2235839