[Comparative study of dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam on plasma catecholamine levels and hemodynamics in patients with septic shock].

医学 咪唑安定 感染性休克 麻醉 右美托咪定 中心静脉压 血流动力学 平均动脉压 血压 休克(循环) 去甲肾上腺素 重症监护室 机械通风 镇静 心率 重症监护 败血症 内科学 重症监护医学 多巴胺
作者
Ling Yao,Bo Liu,Tianhui He,Feng Shen
出处
期刊:PubMed 卷期号:33 (10): 1193-1197 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210119-00105
摘要

To compare the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) and midazolam on the endogenous plasma catecholamine levels and the dosage of exogenous norepinephrine (NE) to maintain blood pressure in patients with septic shock.From January 2018 to December 2019, patients admitted to the department of critical care medicine of the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University who needed invasive mechanical ventilation and had a stay of more than 48 hours in the intensive care unit (ICU) for septic shock and received DEX or midazolam for sedation were enrolled in this study. The hemodynamic data, arterial blood lactic acid (Lac) level, arterial blood gas analysis and vasoactive drug dose at 0, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours after entering the ICU were dynamically recorded, and the plasma catecholamine levels at 0, 24, 48 hours after entering the ICU were recorded. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score on ICU-admission were calculated. The parameters of prognosis were collected.A total of 24 patients were enrolled, 12 in the DEX group and 12 in the midazolam group. There were similar dynamic trends in heart rate (HR), central venous pressure (CVP), venous-arterial carbon dioxide pressure difference (Pv-aCO2), oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), and Lac level of patients between the two groups. Only the 12-hour CVP and 72-hour Pv-aCO2 in the DEX group were significantly higher than those in the midazolam group [CVP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 13±3 vs. 10±3, Pv-aCO2 (mmHg): 9.4±5.2 vs. 4.8±2.2, both P < 0.05], and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) of patients in the DEX group at 48 hours and 72 hours was significantly higher than that in the midazolam group (mmHg: 95±10 vs. 86±10, 96±9 vs. 88±7, both P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU mortality or in-hospital mortality between the DEX group and the midazolam group [duration of mechanical ventilation (days): 5.6 (3.8, 9.5) vs. 10.5 (5.9, 15.0), ICU mortality: 16.7% vs. 33.3%, in-hospital mortality: 25.0% vs. 41.7%, all P > 0.05]. There was no significant difference in the dosage of propofol or sufentanil between the DEX group and the midazolam group [propofol (mg/kg): 0 (0, 9.35) vs. 4.07 (0, 13.75), sufentanil (μg/kg): 6.26 (4.90, 9.80) vs. 8.32 (3.52, 9.34), both P > 0.05]. The levels of plasma NE, dopamine and dobutamine in the DEX group at 48 hours were significantly lower than those in the midazolam group [NE (ng/L): 1 850.12 (342.16, 2 938.05) vs. 4 596.60 (3 310.56, 5 546.84), dopamine (ng/L): 119.10 (60.47, 200.71) vs. 275.40 (214.61, 418.88), dobutamine (ng/L): 51.20 (36.85, 75.59) vs. 98.97 (85.65, 107.10), all P < 0.05], but the amount of NE required to maintain MAP between 65 mmHg and 75 mmHg in the DEX group and the midazolam group was similar [μg/kg: 1 922 (1 170, 4 887) vs. 2 466 (2 043, 3 438), P > 0.05].DEX can reduce plasma catecholamine levels in patients with septic shock more than midazolam, and does not increase the dose of exogenous NE, and has a smaller effect on hemodynamics in patients with septic shock than midazolam.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
jasmine970000完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
神勇的雅香应助zhanzhanzhan采纳,获得10
1秒前
研友_8yPrqZ完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
自信的伊完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
爆米花应助9℃采纳,获得10
3秒前
Raymond完成签到,获得积分0
4秒前
鱼雷发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
甜蜜秋蝶发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
ysl发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
yyy完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
自信的伊发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Stanley发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
大鹏发布了新的文献求助50
5秒前
丘比特应助艺玲采纳,获得10
5秒前
hobowei发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
梦里见陈情完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
JJJ应助szh123采纳,获得10
6秒前
FFFFFFF应助细腻沅采纳,获得10
6秒前
ym发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Yn完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
秋季完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
wwb完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
张自信完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
华仔应助VDC采纳,获得10
9秒前
嘟嘟完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
卡卡完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
十三发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
甩看文献发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527723
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107826
关于积分的说明 9286663
捐赠科研通 2805577
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1539998
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716878
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709762