埃索美拉唑
兰索拉唑
雷贝拉唑
交叉研究
质子抑制剂泵
医学
胃肠病学
内科学
幽门螺杆菌
胃酸
药理学
安慰剂
胃
病理
替代医学
作者
Clive H. Wilder‐Smith,Kerstin Röhss,Catharina Nilsson-Pieschl,Ola Junghard,Lars Nyman
出处
期刊:Digestion
[S. Karger AG]
日期:2003-01-01
卷期号:68 (4): 184-188
被引量:40
摘要
Aim: To compare the effects of standard-dose esomeprazole with those of standard doses of lansoprazole and rabeprazole on intragastric pH during repeated daily oral dosing in healthy volunteers. Methods: In two standardized, randomized crossover studies, Helicobacter pylori negative healthy volunteers (study A: 19 males, 5 females; study B: 13 males, 10 females) received esomeprazole 40 mg and either lansoprazole 30 mg (study A) or rabeprazole 20 mg (study B) orally once daily in the morning for 5 days. Continuous 24-hour intragastric pH recording was performed on day 5. Results: The intragastric pH was maintained >4 for 65% (95% CI 59.5–71.3) of the 24-hour period with esomeprazole and for 53% of the time (95% CI 47.0–58.9) with lansoprazole in study A (p < 0.001). In study B, the proportion of time with pH >4 was 61% (95% CI 53.6–68.3) with esomeprazole versus 45% (95% CI 37.7–52.5) with rabeprazole (p = 0.005). The 24-hour median pH and the proportion of volunteers with intragastric pH >4 for ≧12 h and ≧16 h were significantly higher with esomeprazole than with either lansoprazole or rabeprazole. Conclusion: Esomeprazole 40 mg provides significantly more effective and more sustained gastric acid control than lansoprazole 30 mg or rabeprazole 20 mg in healthy volunteers.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI