SWOG S1815: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

吉西他滨 医学 内科学 危险系数 顺铂 胃肠病学 肿瘤科 化疗 胆道 胰腺癌 泌尿科 癌症 置信区间
作者
Rachna T. Shroff,Gentry Teng King,Sarah Colby,Aaron J. Scott,Mitesh J. Borad,Laura W. Goff,Khalid Matin,Amit Mahipal,Aparna Kalyan,Milind Javle,Imane El Dika,Benjamin Tan,P. Cheema,Anuj Patel,Renuka Iyer,Robin Kate Kelley,Jaykumar Thumar,Anthony B. El-Khoueiry,Katherine A. Guthrie,E. Gabriela Chiorean,Howard S. Hochster,Philip A. Philip
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Oncology [American Society of Clinical Oncology]
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco-24-01383
摘要

PURPOSE SWOG S1815 was a randomized, open label phase III trial, evaluating gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and cisplatin (GAP) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BTC, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), were randomly assigned 2:1 to either GAP (gemcitabine 800 mg/m 2 , cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 , and nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m 2 intravenously once per day on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) or GC (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 intravenously once per day on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle). RESULTS Among 452 randomly assigned participants, 441 were eligible and analyzable, 67% with ICC, 16% with GBC, and 17% with ECC. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between GAP versus GC. Median OS with GAP was 14.0 months (95% CI, 12.4 to 16.1) and 13.6 months with GC (95% CI, 9.7 to 16.6); hazard ratio (HR), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.14); P = .41. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between groups with median PFS for GAP being 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.4 to 8.5) versus 6.3 months for GC (95% CI, 4.4 to 8.2); HR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.12); P = .32. In exploratory subset analyses, the OS and PFS benefits of GAP versus GC treatment were greater in locally advanced disease compared with metastatic disease, although not statistically significant (interaction P = .14 for OS and P = .17 for PFS). Moreover, GAP versus GC showed greater improvement in PFS among participants with GBC than those with ICC or ECC (interaction P = .01), but not OS (interaction P = .28). CONCLUSION The addition of a taxane in the GAP regimen to the standard gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen did not improve OS in newly diagnosed BTC. More toxicity was encountered with GAP versus GC.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lala发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
烤鸭发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
HHH完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
轩辕无忧发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
熱風完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
SciGPT应助穗禾采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
大猩猩发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
zeno123456完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
CC完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
wanci应助May采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
捡针雨完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
勤奋曼雁发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Sein完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
默默曼冬完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI2S应助Southluuu采纳,获得10
9秒前
11秒前
Orange应助莘莘采纳,获得10
11秒前
kun发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
15秒前
orixero应助六月采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
Fox发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
18秒前
李健应助小魏不吃香菜采纳,获得10
19秒前
上官若男应助聚乙二醇采纳,获得10
19秒前
panyi发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
孤独天薇发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
李佳轩发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
莲蓬完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
cara应助南风不竞采纳,获得10
26秒前
酷波er应助panyi采纳,获得10
26秒前
zanwu发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
迷人凡松发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
高分求助中
The late Devonian Standard Conodont Zonation 2000
Nickel superalloy market size, share, growth, trends, and forecast 2023-2030 2000
The Lali Section: An Excellent Reference Section for Upper - Devonian in South China 1500
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 890
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
Saponins and sapogenins. IX. Saponins and sapogenins of Luffa aegyptica mill seeds (black variety) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3260219
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2901451
关于积分的说明 8315734
捐赠科研通 2571024
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1396784
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 653580
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 631997