医学
养生
耐受性
药品
不利影响
内科学
药理学
重症监护医学
作者
Kevin M. Gibas,Sean G. Kelly,José Ramón Arribas,Pedro Cahn,Chloe Orkin,Eric S. Daar,Paul E. Sax,Babafemi Taiwo
出处
期刊:The Lancet HIV
[Elsevier]
日期:2022-10-26
卷期号:9 (12): e868-e883
被引量:30
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2352-3018(22)00249-1
摘要
Combination therapy with three antiretroviral agents has been integral to successful HIV-1 treatment since 1996. Although the efficacy, adverse effects, and toxicities of contemporary three-drug regimens have improved, even the newest therapies have potential adverse effects. The use of two-drug regimens is one way to reduce lifetime exposure to antiretroviral drugs while maintaining the benefits of viral suppression. Multiple large, randomised trials have shown the virological non-inferiority of certain two-drug regimens versus three-drug comparators, including adverse effect differences that reflect known profiles of the antiretroviral drugs in the respective regimens. Two-drug combinations are now recommended in treatment guidelines and include the first long-acting antiretroviral regimen for the treatment of HIV-1. Recommended two-drug regimens differ in their risks for, and factors associated with, virological failure and emergent resistance. The tolerability, safety, metabolic profiles, and drug interactions of two-drug regimens also vary by the constituent drugs. No current two-drug regimen is recommended for people with chronic hepatitis B virus as none include tenofovir. Two-drug regimens have increased options for individualised care.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI