Best evidence summary for prevention and management of enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients

医学 肠外营养 科克伦图书馆 梅德林 肠内给药 循证医学 重症监护医学 指南 系统回顾 病危 循证实践 临床营养学 最佳实践 卓越 家庭医学 荟萃分析 替代医学 内科学 病理 管理 政治学 法学 经济
作者
Fang Peng,Huaqin Wang,Jianzhi Li,Mengqi Ma,Xuemeng Jiang,Han Run,Li Qingting,Juanjuan Leng,Luwei Xiao,Li Tang
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Nursing [Wiley]
卷期号:33 (3): 781-796 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1111/jocn.16934
摘要

Abstract Aim To evaluate and summarize the evidence for prevention and management of enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients and provide reference for clinical practice. Design This study was an evidence summary followed by the evidence summary reporting standard of Fudan University Center for Evidence‐based Nursing. Methods Current literatures were systematically searched for the best evidence for prevention and management of enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients. Literature types included clinical guidelines, best practice information sheets, expert consensuses, systematic reviews, evidence summaries and cohort studies. Data Sources UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, Joanna Briggs Institute, Guidelines International Network, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Sinomed, Web of Science, Yi Maitong Guidelines Network, DynaMed, MEDLINE, CNKI, WanFang database, Chinese Medical Journal Full‐text Database, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism website, the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition website were searched from January 2012 to April 2023. Results We finally identified 18 articles that had high‐quality results. We summarized the 24 pieces of best evidence from these articles, covering five aspects: screening and assessment of the risk of enteral nutritional tolerance; formulation of enteral nutrition preparations; enteral nutritional feeding implementation; feeding intolerance symptom prevention and management; and multidisciplinary management. Of these pieces of evidence, 19 were ‘strong’ and 5 were ‘weak’, 7 pieces of evidence were recommended in level one and 4 pieces of evidence were recommended in level two. Conclusion The following 24 pieces of evidence for prevention and management of enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients were finally recommended. However, as these evidences came from different countries, relevant factors such as the clinical environment should be evaluated before application. Future studies should focus on more specific symptoms of feeding intolerance and more targeted prevention design applications. Implications for the profession and patient care The clinical medical staffs are recommended to take evidence‐based recommendations for the implementation of standardized enteral nutrition to improve patient outcomes and decrease gastrointestinal intolerance in critically ill patients. Impact The management of enteral nutrition feeding intolerance has always been a challenge and difficulty in critically ill patients. This study summarizes 24 pieces of the best evidence for prevention and management of enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients. Following and implementing these 24 pieces of evidence is beneficial to the prevention and management of feeding intolerance in clinical practice. The 24 pieces of evidence include five aspects, including screening and assessment of the risk of enteral nutritional tolerance, formulation of enteral nutrition preparations, enteral nutritional feeding implementation, feeding intolerance symptom prevention and management and multidisciplinary management. These five aspects constitute a good implementation process. Screening and assessment of enteral nutritional tolerance throughout intervention are important guarantees for developing a feasible nutrition program in critically ill patients. This study will be benefit to global medical workers in the nutritional management of critically ill patients. Reporting Method This evidence summary followed the evidence summary reporting specifications of Fudan University Center for Evidence‐based Nursing, which were based on the methodological process for the summary of the evidence produced by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The reporting specifications include problem establishment, literature retrieval, literature screening, literature evaluation, the summary and grading of evidence and the formation of practical suggestions. This study was based on the evidence summary reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for the Evidence‐based Nursing, the register name is ‘Best evidence summary for prevention and management of enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients’, the registration number is ‘ES20231823’.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大橙子发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
jenny完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
祁乐安完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
naiyouqiu1989完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
zjhzslq发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
baoxiaozhai完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
fy完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
强公子完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
15秒前
song完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
怡然小蚂蚁完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
小橙子完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
SciGPT应助滴答采纳,获得10
18秒前
大气白翠完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
确幸完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
zjhzslq完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
xdc发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
ommphey完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
牛哥还是强啊完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
科研通AI2S应助屈岂愈采纳,获得10
22秒前
好名字完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
kongzhiqiqi完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
滴答完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
浅浅殇完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
31秒前
滴答发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
高高的天亦完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
星空完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
文艺的青旋完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
青黛完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
大橙子发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
48秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
明钟达完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
byyyy完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高高的哈密瓜完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Rondab应助橙汁采纳,获得10
1分钟前
读书的时候完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038128
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575831
关于积分的说明 11373827
捐赠科研通 3305610
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819255
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022