已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
张泽东发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
yl完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
wanci应助星城采纳,获得10
3秒前
王威完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
ding应助研友_Z6Qrbn采纳,获得10
5秒前
李健应助娜子采纳,获得10
6秒前
谷雨完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
七秒鱼发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
万能图书馆应助Xwu采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
likw23完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
完美世界应助花海采纳,获得10
8秒前
靓丽中道发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
郭丹丹完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
lys发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
敏感代云完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Lucas应助天棱采纳,获得10
14秒前
华仔应助七秒鱼采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
洁净的士晋完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
wanci应助zeppeli采纳,获得20
16秒前
善学以致用应助zeppeli采纳,获得10
16秒前
赘婿应助zeppeli采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
我是老大应助zeppeli采纳,获得10
17秒前
领导范儿应助zeppeli采纳,获得10
17秒前
大模型应助zeppeli采纳,获得10
17秒前
汉堡包应助zeppeli采纳,获得10
17秒前
搜集达人应助zeppeli采纳,获得10
17秒前
ding应助zeppeli采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
Orange应助112323采纳,获得10
19秒前
Owen应助追寻的问玉采纳,获得10
19秒前
花海发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
科研通AI6.1应助PAD采纳,获得10
25秒前
芝士完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 2000
Psychology and Work Today 1000
Research for Social Workers 1000
Mastering New Drug Applications: A Step-by-Step Guide (Mastering the FDA Approval Process Book 1) 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5907075
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 6787072
关于积分的说明 15766846
捐赠科研通 5030587
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2708735
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1657661
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1602375