清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
wakawaka完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
啊蛋蛋发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
小书生完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
啊蛋蛋完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
25秒前
周晴完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
研友_nxw2xL完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
SciGPT应助大哥我猪呢采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
如歌完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
打打应助hEbuy采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Ryan完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
刘琼发布了新的文献求助30
2分钟前
核桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
hjysyg完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
hjysyg发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
刘琼完成签到,获得积分20
2分钟前
2分钟前
蝎子莱莱xth完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
氢锂钠钾铷铯钫完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
Square完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
Akim应助科研小举人采纳,获得10
3分钟前
玛卡巴卡爱吃饭完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
Shero发布了新的文献求助20
4分钟前
CRUSADER发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
luis完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
紫熊完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
灿烂而孤独的八戒完成签到 ,获得积分0
5分钟前
英俊的铭应助Shero采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
金水相生发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Lewis’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook Sixth Edition 2000
Engineering for calcareous sediments : proceedings of the International Conference on Calcareous Sediments, Perth 15-18 March 1988 / edited by R.J. Jewell, D.C. Andrews 1000
Wolffs Headache and Other Head Pain 9th Edition 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Austrian Economics: An Introduction 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6229675
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8054395
关于积分的说明 16795396
捐赠科研通 5311635
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2829191
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1807000
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1665378