亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:68
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
FZH发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
reborn发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
level完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
FZH关闭了FZH文献求助
9秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助krajicek采纳,获得10
10秒前
优秀水蓝应助bullfrog2026采纳,获得10
11秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
Kao应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
MchemG应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
15秒前
GingerF应助cy0824采纳,获得200
21秒前
行走的荷尔蒙完成签到 ,获得积分0
23秒前
25秒前
33秒前
37秒前
Lucas应助reborn采纳,获得10
49秒前
52秒前
56秒前
reborn发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
sammi米应助清爽的微笑采纳,获得10
1分钟前
下一页完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
breeze完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Andy完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
Copyright应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
MchemG应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
2分钟前
reborn发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
孙乾炀发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
卜哥完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
所所应助reborn采纳,获得10
2分钟前
tt完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
hhq完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
The recovery-stress questionnaires : user manual 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7257526
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8879428
关于积分的说明 18757084
捐赠科研通 6937891
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3201074
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375192
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2176937