Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
039Hc完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
健康的人生完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
冷酷保温杯完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
CipherSage应助wcx采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
orixero应助冷艳的咖啡采纳,获得10
3秒前
杨瑞鹏发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
莫西莫西完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
欢喜代萱完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
weizheng发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
hoh发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
丘比特应助墨尔根戴青采纳,获得10
11秒前
熊子康儿子完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
20001019发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
久9完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
Jasper应助zy采纳,获得10
12秒前
xingsixs完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
徐行完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
且放青山远完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
雪烟飞扬完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
龙卡烧烤店完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
寒梅恋雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
ding应助茉莉奶绿采纳,获得10
15秒前
努力发光的GT完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
kk发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
心念完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
Owen应助朱研究采纳,获得10
18秒前
穢翼发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
陈永伟发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
woc可怕完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
今后应助东白湖的无奈采纳,获得10
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The impact of workplace variables on juvenile probation officers’ job satisfaction 1000
When the badge of honor holds no meaning anymore 1000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
AnnualResearch andConsultation Report of Panorama survey and Investment strategy onChinaIndustry 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6279320
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8098552
关于积分的说明 16930688
捐赠科研通 5347391
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2842605
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1819904
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1677081