Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
fanghongjian发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
清爽友儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
清秀书兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
慕尼黑发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
wenqin发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
核桃发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
Owen应助阿戈美拉丁采纳,获得10
5秒前
一一发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
个性浩然发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
科研发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
大胆的锅包肉完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
nxett发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
9秒前
努力学习ing完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
iMi关注了科研通微信公众号
9秒前
子凯发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
科研通AI6.3应助顺势而为采纳,获得10
11秒前
彭凯完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
LR发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
LRISEM发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
zhangyapeng完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
KL关闭了KL文献求助
15秒前
汉堡包应助Ling采纳,获得10
15秒前
爱笑灵雁发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 9th Edition 500
Social Work and Social Welfare: An Invitation(7th Edition) 410
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6053059
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7869796
关于积分的说明 16277100
捐赠科研通 5198495
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2781434
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1764404
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1646067