已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
冰激凌发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
芳华如梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
陈1发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
慕青应助彭蓬采纳,获得10
5秒前
辛勤雁凡发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
CipherSage应助Moxley采纳,获得10
6秒前
jw2025完成签到 ,获得积分20
13秒前
痞老板死磕蟹黄堡完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
科目三应助吃道格的恺特采纳,获得10
20秒前
1234完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
酷波er应助陈1采纳,获得10
21秒前
小蘑菇应助Zr采纳,获得20
22秒前
23秒前
煎饼果子完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
jw2025关注了科研通微信公众号
26秒前
1234发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
彭蓬完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
sxd完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
27秒前
30秒前
怕黑水蓝应助不嘻嘻嘻采纳,获得10
30秒前
彭蓬发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
甜美千山完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
刹那的颜色完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
andrele完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
Hello应助sunny66采纳,获得10
45秒前
科研通AI2S应助1234采纳,获得10
48秒前
ca完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
53秒前
54秒前
lxy完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
wjy完成签到 ,获得积分10
59秒前
59秒前
Moxley发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
22发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
吃草草没完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
shentaii完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
脑电大模型与情感脑机接口研究--郑伟龙 500
GMP in Practice: Regulatory Expectations for the Pharmaceutical Industry 500
简明药物化学习题答案 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6299032
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8116104
关于积分的说明 16990807
捐赠科研通 5360255
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2847594
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1825062
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1679354