Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
传奇3应助hlw采纳,获得10
刚刚
花生日记发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
南浔完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
顺利毕业发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
善学以致用应助童童采纳,获得10
4秒前
rainbow完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
隐形的大有完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
火星上的飞槐完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
脑洞疼应助高分捕猎者采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
含蓄蜗牛完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
淮山五加皮完成签到 ,获得积分20
8秒前
10秒前
木子完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
FashionBoy应助清爽飞莲采纳,获得10
10秒前
Adel完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
Balance Man完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
飘逸秋双发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
隐形曼青应助Li采纳,获得10
13秒前
shore完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
VDC发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
哈基米发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
HugginBearOuO完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
需要帮助的探险者完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Akim应助hongjie_w采纳,获得10
16秒前
zhengguibin发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
顺利毕业完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
海尐完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
kingxc完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
自觉曼岚发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
fuzhou完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Principles of town planning : translating concepts to applications 500
Short-Wavelength Infrared Windows for Biomedical Applications 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6060919
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7893249
关于积分的说明 16305086
捐赠科研通 5204876
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2784583
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1767133
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1647351