Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 恶化 安慰剂 哮喘 内科学 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 嗜酸性粒细胞 病理 替代医学
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Mingli Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne A. Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wawa发布了新的文献求助30
刚刚
mervynzcy发布了新的文献求助50
刚刚
会武功的阿吉完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
123发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
小羊发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
森森完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
李敏之发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
今后应助高高魂幽采纳,获得10
1秒前
cheng发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
zlg发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
Lucas应助VanillaTwilight采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
称心的访彤完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
兔兔酱发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Bmyndm发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
DrJiang发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
科研通AI2S应助墨离采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
研友_Z7mKyL发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
mervynzcy完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
Lucas应助无欲无求傻傻采纳,获得10
8秒前
zijin发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
自觉的天亦完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
10秒前
寒冷的怀薇完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
超级七七发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
13秒前
Lily完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
16秒前
研友_Z72jyn发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
文静醉易发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
ISSN 2159-8274 EISSN 2159-8290 1000
Becoming: An Introduction to Jung's Concept of Individuation 600
Ore genesis in the Zambian Copperbelt with particular reference to the northern sector of the Chambishi basin 500
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3160609
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2811828
关于积分的说明 7893452
捐赠科研通 2470647
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1315718
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 630929
版权声明 602052