Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
丘比特应助Cynthia采纳,获得30
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
cssfsa发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
3秒前
鱼辞发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
祥瑞发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
李爱国应助牛阳雨采纳,获得10
6秒前
共享精神应助仁爱曼梅采纳,获得10
7秒前
无限无声完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
cccr完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
共享精神应助舒适的素采纳,获得10
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
星辰大海应助gzmejiji采纳,获得10
10秒前
曾泓跃发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
归尘应助二十一日采纳,获得30
12秒前
Litm完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
liu11发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
李墩墩发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
17秒前
RR完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
wanci应助99910119采纳,获得10
19秒前
liu11完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
热情冬灵发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
Hannah发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助mym采纳,获得10
22秒前
舒适的素发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
fzzf发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
青筠发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
天天快乐应助drift采纳,获得10
23秒前
大模型应助rachaoer采纳,获得10
24秒前
浮游应助唐阳采纳,获得10
25秒前
梓镱儿完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
拼搏的璇发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.).. Frederic G. Reamer 1070
Alloy Phase Diagrams 1000
Introduction to Early Childhood Education 1000
2025-2031年中国兽用抗生素行业发展深度调研与未来趋势报告 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 891
Historical Dictionary of British Intelligence (2014 / 2nd EDITION!) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5425064
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4539194
关于积分的说明 14166180
捐赠科研通 4456338
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2444167
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1435182
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1412494