Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
犹豫大侠发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
久等雨归发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
万能图书馆应助夜阑采纳,获得10
1秒前
xuelanghu完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小小怪夏士完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
yhr完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
华仔应助秀丽的小懒虫采纳,获得10
4秒前
Emily发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
tianruiyi完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
yhr发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
LiuHao发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
隐形曼青应助汐芫采纳,获得10
6秒前
斯文败类应助纯真的不二采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
niu发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
余笙发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Phospho发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
zhanfu20关注了科研通微信公众号
10秒前
yangsir发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
guanyc完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
思思思颖发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
13秒前
qin123发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
大气赛凤发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
沙洲发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
star发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
英姑应助烤冷面采纳,获得10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Quality by Design - An Indispensable Approach to Accelerate Biopharmaceutical Product Development 800
Pulse width control of a 3-phase inverter with non sinusoidal phase voltages 777
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Research Methods for Applied Linguistics: A Practical Guide 600
Research Methods for Applied Linguistics 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6403795
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8222602
关于积分的说明 17427114
捐赠科研通 5456255
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2883397
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1859694
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1701131