Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
格子大王完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
余咋发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Hello应助陈同学采纳,获得10
1秒前
三文鱼发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
炼丹师应助CHBW采纳,获得20
1秒前
yxt完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
揽星色应助娇气的背包采纳,获得10
2秒前
DZ发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Owen应助木子贝贝采纳,获得10
2秒前
angelinazh发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
上官若男应助晋启轩采纳,获得10
4秒前
浮游应助wocao采纳,获得10
4秒前
6秒前
7秒前
南风发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
wqx发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
深情安青应助王小冉采纳,获得30
7秒前
8秒前
loong应助赖沛采纳,获得30
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
椿上春树发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Ava应助156548采纳,获得20
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
朱荧荧完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
余咋完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
魏某某完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Yoh1220完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Comprehensive Toxicology Fourth Edition 24000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
World Nuclear Fuel Report: Global Scenarios for Demand and Supply Availability 2025-2040 800
The Social Work Ethics Casebook(2nd,Frederic G. R) 600
HEAT TRANSFER EQUIPMENT DESIGN Advanced Study Institute Book 500
Master Curve-Auswertungen und Untersuchung des Größeneffekts für C(T)-Proben - aktuelle Erkenntnisse zur Untersuchung des Master Curve Konzepts für ferritisches Gusseisen mit Kugelgraphit bei dynamischer Beanspruchung (Projekt MCGUSS) 500
A novel angiographic index for predicting the efficacy of drug-coated balloons in small vessels 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5113903
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4321280
关于积分的说明 13464996
捐赠科研通 4152777
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2275420
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1277450
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1215482