Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
桃源theshy发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
kingwill举报求助违规成功
2秒前
wdy111举报求助违规成功
2秒前
Zel博博举报求助违规成功
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
乂贰ZERO叁发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
小二郎应助山城小肘子采纳,获得30
8秒前
Muhammad发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
jundading发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
桃源theshy完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
牛姐发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
ZWE发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
邵裘完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
科目三应助Dylan采纳,获得10
11秒前
幸运海星完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
智智完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
feng发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
奥特超曼应助千余采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
Wcx发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
X519664508完成签到,获得积分0
14秒前
15秒前
冰红茶完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
haha发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
呆呆熊完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
加油呀完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
共享精神应助ddddd采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
我是老大应助呆呆熊采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
lc发布了新的文献求助30
20秒前
21秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3989645
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3531805
关于积分的说明 11254983
捐赠科研通 3270372
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804966
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882136
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809176