Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:68
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
坦率的从菡完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
4秒前
田燕华完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
CC发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
哇哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
魔法河豚完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
R可欣发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
10秒前
Ava应助魔法河豚采纳,获得10
10秒前
麻辣老妖婆完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
汉堡包应助眼睛大以寒采纳,获得10
17秒前
离枝驳回了Lucas应助
18秒前
leilei完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
CipherSage应助大溺采纳,获得10
18秒前
我找到月亮了完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
Ava应助小张要加油采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
长大lwp完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
22秒前
22秒前
大模型应助淡淡夕阳采纳,获得10
24秒前
kk发布了新的文献求助50
25秒前
ygsts发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
26秒前
27秒前
27秒前
29秒前
29秒前
大溺发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
rrrrrrun发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
32秒前
鲸与海发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
玩具枪完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
缥缈的剑鬼完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
34秒前
甘氨酸完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
乾隆发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
咳嗽・喀痰の診療ガイドライン第2版2025 800
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Electrode Potentials 550
The globalisation of real estate: the politics and practice of foreign real estate investment 500
Handbook Of Synthetic Methodologies And Protocols Of Nanomaterials 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7015396
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8688482
关于积分的说明 18417986
捐赠科研通 6504340
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3106861
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2177769
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2082756