亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
忐忑的方盒完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
嘻嘻哈哈应助彭进水采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Ryan完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
饼干完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
xbb0905发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
xbb0905完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
追风发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
理想家完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
Hello应助追风采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
QQQQ发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
QQQQ完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
追风发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
Tree_QD完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
喜悦的小土豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
ding应助追风采纳,获得10
4分钟前
我是老大应助君寻采纳,获得10
4分钟前
失眠呆呆鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
lushanxihai完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
isjj完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
Lucas应助阿七奶呼呼的采纳,获得10
4分钟前
5分钟前
追风发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
光光发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
光光完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
科目三应助追风采纳,获得10
6分钟前
6分钟前
yuyuan发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
Francis发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
6分钟前
追风发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
7分钟前
qc发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
所所应助qc采纳,获得10
7分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Lewis’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook Sixth Edition 2000
Wolffs Headache and Other Head Pain 9th Edition 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
荧光膀胱镜诊治膀胱癌 500
First trimester ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormalities 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6223445
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8048730
关于积分的说明 16779460
捐赠科研通 5308143
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2827681
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1805712
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1664844