Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zhangdamiao发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
dch完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
枫威发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小不遛w完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
CipherSage应助顷梦采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
YAN发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
等待的平凡完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
xuanggu发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
包觅风完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
qingzhiwu发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
眼睛大映阳完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
思源应助天真的万声采纳,获得10
6秒前
plm发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Soyuu完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
天天快乐应助cc采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6.3应助wyt采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI6.2应助木木楷采纳,获得10
9秒前
在水一方应助善良水池采纳,获得10
10秒前
星辰大海应助黎小静采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
张雅琪发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
云中子发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
zhtgang完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
xqk完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
ytong完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
王伟发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
传奇3应助阔达的沛儿采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
卡布叻发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
恶搞等你发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
環宸完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Vinny发布了新的文献求助30
17秒前
Jasper应助温婉的跳跳糖采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
Digital and Social Media Marketing 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5982791
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7378862
关于积分的说明 16029304
捐赠科研通 5123045
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2749260
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1719367
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1625589