Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Mn完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
yulinhai发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
kranran完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
完美无敌发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
青藤发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
刘刘佳发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
奋斗青年应助纯真初曼采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
和谐冬卉完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
上官以山完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
PIKAPIKAQ发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
在水一方应助sinian思念采纳,获得10
3秒前
BAMBOO完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Regulus完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
学术垃圾发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
丘比特应助Lin2019采纳,获得10
5秒前
在水一方应助kenny2023采纳,获得10
5秒前
Spacewings完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
杨华启发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
皓月星辰完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
负责御姐完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
LHD发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
Owen应助Jerry采纳,获得10
8秒前
跳跃毒娘发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
丘比特应助奇异果熊猫人采纳,获得10
8秒前
浮游应助Dai JZ采纳,获得10
8秒前
10秒前
Hank完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Spacewings发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
samurai完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE CMOS IMAGE SENSORS FOR LOW LIGHT APPLICATIONS 1500
Constitutional and Administrative Law 1000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 530
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5352065
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4485004
关于积分的说明 13961490
捐赠科研通 4384753
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2409168
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1401603
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1375188