Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
久念发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
住在月亮隔壁完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
整个好活完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
wabfye应助上官冷不冷采纳,获得10
1秒前
啊哭完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
zgx完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
3秒前
4秒前
斯文败类应助落伍少年采纳,获得10
4秒前
梅子黄时雨完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
wwk发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
SciGPT应助倩Q采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
yxw发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
CipherSage应助PJ采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
classic发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
大模型应助久念采纳,获得10
11秒前
Criminology34发布了新的文献求助200
11秒前
CodeCraft应助看起来不太强采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
aging00发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
Doubility完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
奋斗发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
忐忑的小玉完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
tiptip应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
兰亭序发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
tiptip应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Relation between chemical structure and local anesthetic action: tertiary alkylamine derivatives of diphenylhydantoin 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Principles of town planning : translating concepts to applications 500
Work Engagement and Employee Well-being 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6068754
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7900833
关于积分的说明 16331668
捐赠科研通 5210166
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2786796
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1769692
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1647925