Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
蓝莓橘子酱应助高野采纳,获得10
1秒前
3秒前
哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
gxzsdf完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
某某完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
打铁佬完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
健壮惋清发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
行走De太阳花完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
长命百岁完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
王伟轩应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
小二郎应助健壮惋清采纳,获得10
25秒前
华仔应助江清月近人采纳,获得10
27秒前
今后应助F光采纳,获得10
27秒前
30秒前
fabea完成签到,获得积分0
33秒前
Qinzhiyuan1990完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
韩老魔完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
Young完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
平常澜完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
39秒前
852应助高野采纳,获得10
41秒前
F光发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
ShellyMaya完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
Lanyiyang完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
to高坚果完成签到,获得积分20
46秒前
科研通AI2S应助bi采纳,获得10
46秒前
46秒前
榴莲完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
Blaseaka完成签到 ,获得积分0
47秒前
F光完成签到,获得积分20
48秒前
酸菜爱生活完成签到 ,获得积分10
55秒前
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6028477
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7691310
关于积分的说明 16186679
捐赠科研通 5175694
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2769640
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1753069
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1638845