Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
朴素代秋完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
杜薇薇发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
咖啡豆发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
高兴溪流完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
ymjssg应助lee采纳,获得10
3秒前
帅气的机器猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助浮浮采纳,获得10
3秒前
wzt发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
稻香茶煦发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
大个应助doing采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
张天宇完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
共享精神应助YingyingFan采纳,获得10
6秒前
crazy完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
高兴溪流发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
yzr发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
yike关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
6秒前
自觉从筠发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
玛卡巴卡完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
上官若男应助子姜采纳,获得10
7秒前
LittleWang完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
科研通AI2S应助积雨云采纳,获得10
8秒前
chall应助nullchuang采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
vivre223发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
年富力强聂师傅完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
星星发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
LittleWang发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 880
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
3rd Edition Group Dynamics in Exercise and Sport Psychology New Perspectives Edited By Mark R. Beauchamp, Mark Eys Copyright 2025 600
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
nephSAP® Nephrology Self-Assessment Program - Hypertension The American Society of Nephrology 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5624997
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4710900
关于积分的说明 14952616
捐赠科研通 4778944
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2553493
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1515444
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1475731