已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wure10完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
小赵完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
半岛完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
独特的夜阑完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
nolan完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
5秒前
5秒前
风流付笑谈完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
雨树樱子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
古风完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
张林夕发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
受伤筝完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
tina6918发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
吴彦祖应助三水采纳,获得20
10秒前
10秒前
郑郑发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
NicoLi发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
诚先生完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
王婷完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
赧赧完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
Ava应助乐观慕山采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
NicoLi完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
loopy完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
爱听歌寄风完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
orixero应助郑文涛采纳,获得10
20秒前
XiaoM发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
沉静的万天完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
科研通AI6应助小张采纳,获得10
21秒前
23秒前
fygiuh完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
Slhy完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
体贴的夜山完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
高分求助中
Aerospace Standards Index - 2025 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 1000
Teaching Language in Context (Third Edition) 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 941
流动的新传统主义与新生代农民工的劳动力再生产模式变迁 500
Historical Dictionary of British Intelligence (2014 / 2nd EDITION!) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5443627
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4553459
关于积分的说明 14242003
捐赠科研通 4475123
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2452281
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1443217
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1418804