Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

美波利祖马布 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 哮喘 内科学 荟萃分析 皮肤病科 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Tanawin Nopsopon,Grace Lassiter,Ming‐Li Chen,G. Caleb Alexander,Corinne Keet,Hwanhee Hong,Ayobami Akenroye
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:151 (3): 747-755 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.021
摘要

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma.We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma.The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire.Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL.In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
麦当劳信徒完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
默默发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
坚定灭绝完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
hui发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
kaola发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
坦率的棉花糖完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
George发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
天天快乐应助魔幻的可乐采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
默默完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
小二郎应助崔先生采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
超级小狗发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
11秒前
小太阳哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
可爱的函函应助肖浩翔采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
SuHo发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Yous发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
嘻嘻发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
DKC发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
觉皇发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
食草味发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
qq发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
爆米花应助火星弟弟采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
猫南北发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
嘻嘻完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
香蕉觅云应助wrscience采纳,获得10
21秒前
FashionBoy应助觉皇采纳,获得10
22秒前
大力的灵雁应助聪明尔阳采纳,获得10
23秒前
czyuuu发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
ghn123456789完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
苏格完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 1000
Engineering for calcareous sediments : proceedings of the International Conference on Calcareous Sediments, Perth 15-18 March 1988 / edited by R.J. Jewell, D.C. Andrews 1000
Wolffs Headache and Other Head Pain 9th Edition 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
Harnessing Lymphocyte-Cytokine Networks to Disrupt Current Paradigms in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome Management: A Systematic Evidence Synthesis 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6253076
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8075854
关于积分的说明 16867155
捐赠科研通 5327227
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2836304
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1813674
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1668428