医学
惊喜
介绍
预测值
缓和医疗
诊断试验中的似然比
人口
考试(生物学)
正谓词值
重症监护医学
家庭医学
内科学
护理部
心理学
古生物学
环境卫生
生物
社会心理学
作者
Mellar P. Davis,Karan Soni,Spencer Strobel
标识
DOI:10.1177/10499091221132454
摘要
Palliative care has several tools and questionnaires which are commonly used for patient-related outcomes and prognosis. As an example, the Surprise Question (I would or would not be surprised that this person would have died in a year) has been used as a screen for palliative care referral but also used as a prognostic tool. Diagnostic tests, prognostic tools, and tools for gauging outcomes have certain sensitivity and specificity in predicting a diagnosis or outcome. Clinicians often use positive and negative predictive values in judging the merits of a diagnostic tool or questionnaire. However positive and negative predictive values are highly dependent on the prevalence of disease or outcome in a population and thus are not portable across studies. Likelihood ratios are both portable across populations but also provide the strength of the diagnostic or predictive measure of a test or questionnaire. In this article, we review the value and limitations of likelihood ratios and illustrate the value of using likelihood ratios using 3 studies centered on the Surprise Question published in 2022.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI