Correlation between the Points of Different Seismic Intensity Scales

GOST(哈希函数) 强度(物理) 比例(比率) 地震学 地质学 统计 地理 数学 地图学 物理 量子力学
作者
F. F. Aptikaev,O. O. Erteleva,G. M. Tokmulina
出处
期刊:Seismic Instruments [Springer Nature]
卷期号:57 (1): 75-87
标识
DOI:10.3103/s0747923921010035
摘要

The seismic intensity scale is one of the oldest instruments for determining the extent of seismic vibrations. Being initially a descriptive characteristic of seismic impact, intensity has long required only more detailed, thorough consideration and recording of the consequences and manifestations of various primary and secondary effects in earthquakes in order to increase its accuracy. The indicators were changes in the natural environment, the reactions of humans and animals, and the results of the impacts of seismic events on various engineering structures. Obviously, the latter research objects listed in this series have the most variable characteristics over time. The emergence of new building structures and materials had to be reflected in the seismic intensity scales. This is encouraging changes in the scales used and the development of new scales. At the same time, there is the problem of the correlation of earthquake intensity estimates over different seismic intensity scales. The article considers the problem of quantitative assessment of differences in intensity determination according to the MCS, MM, MSK-64, and EMS-98 scales, as well as two new national Russian standards, GOST R 57546–2017 and GOST 34511−2018. Comparison is carried out separately according to the macroseismic and instrumental parts of scales. Macroseismic descriptions of individual points (gradations) is analyzed using indicator object, people, objects, buildings and structures, and natural phenomena. Each indicator is considered separately. For the MCS, MM, and MSK-64 scales, as well as GOST R 57546–2017 and GOST 34511−2018, their instrumental parts were compared. Based on these studies, it was concluded that the macroseismic parts of these scales coincide, with the exception of low estimates of the dimensions of fissures in soils on the MSK-64 scale. Average differences in the descriptions of damage to buildings and structures do not exceed 0.1 points. Significant differences exist in the instrumental parts of MM, MSK-64, and GOST R 57546–2017.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小顾发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
科研通AI6应助meng采纳,获得30
1秒前
imtoto发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
小蚂蚁发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
八森木发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
MiriamYu完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
爱笑的枫叶完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
璐璐发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
jeonghan完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
共享精神应助飞飞鱼采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
wennuo发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
小二郎应助狼魂采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
mahuahua完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
HHH发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
歪歪完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
菜鸟队长完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
xzzt完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
英姑应助冷傲汽车采纳,获得10
6秒前
xinyuf完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
HMX发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
hu123完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
keyan应助yueweigang采纳,获得10
9秒前
纯真的盼柳完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
jeonghan发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
所所应助笑点低的小天鹅采纳,获得10
10秒前
aaaaaa发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 880
Stop Talking About Wellbeing: A Pragmatic Approach to Teacher Workload 800
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
3rd Edition Group Dynamics in Exercise and Sport Psychology New Perspectives Edited By Mark R. Beauchamp, Mark Eys Copyright 2025 600
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
Terminologia Embryologica 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5618980
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4703923
关于积分的说明 14924415
捐赠科研通 4758994
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2550336
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1513125
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1474401