流产
医学
胚胎移植
活产
随机对照试验
体外受精
妊娠率
荟萃分析
怀孕
妇科
胚胎
胚胎冷冻保存
产科
低温保存
外科
内科学
生物
细胞生物学
遗传学
作者
Wanlin Zhang,Xifeng Xiao,Junyan Zhang,Wenjun Wang,Jing Wu,Ling Peng,Xiaohong Wang
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00404-018-4786-5
摘要
To examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) results in better clinical outcomes than fresh embryo transfer (ET).Meta-analysis.We conducted an electronic literature search on PubMed and Embase databases and manually supplemented another 2 articles from relevant citations. Seven studies were finally included in the meta-analysis,including 1141 women who underwent fresh embryo transfer and 1079 who underwent frozen embryo transfer. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that the live birth rate [RR (95% CI) 1.18 (1.08-1.30), P = 0.0003] and clinical pregnancy rate [RR (95% CI) 1.10 (1.02-1.19), P = 0.02] were significantly higher in FET group. Miscarriage rate [RR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.48-0.80), P = 0.0002], and moderate to severe OHSS occurrence rate [RR (95% CI) 0.22 (0.12 to 0.39), P < 0.00001] were significantly lower in FET group. Differences of biochemical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate between the two groups did not reach the statistical significance.Our results suggest that the IVF/ICSI with FET is more efficient and less risky for OHSS compared with ET. However, we should comprehensively inform patients with advantages, disadvantages and potential risks related to embryo cryopreservation, and carefully assess their fertility conditions to make the most beneficial clinical decision.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI