Heterogeneity in Surgical Quality Improvement in Michigan

医学 百分点 回顾性队列研究 质量管理 急诊医学 急诊科 外科 统计 运营管理 数学 精神科 经济 管理制度
作者
Alisha Lussiez,Ryan E. Eton,Maia Anderson,Valeria S.M. Valbuena,Darrell A. Campbell,Michael J. Englesbe,Ryan Howard
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:277 (4): 612-618 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000005282
摘要

Objective: To evaluate changes in 30-day postoperative outcomes and individual hospital variation in outcomes from 2012–2019 in a collaborative quality improvement network. Summary Background Data: Collaborative quality improvement efforts have been shown to improve postoperative outcomes overall, however, heterogeneity in improvement between participating hospitals remains unclear. Understanding the distribution of individual hospital-level changes is necessary to inform resource allocation and policy design. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 51 hospitals in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) from 2012–2019. Risk- and reliability-adjusted hospital rates of 30-day mortality, complications, serious complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and reoperations were calculated for each year and compared between the last two years and the first two years of the study period. Results: There was a significant decrease in the rates of all 5 adverse outcomes across MSQC hospitals from 2012–2019. Of the 51 individual hospitals, 31 (61%) hospitals achieved a decrease in mortality (range -1.3 percentage points to +0.6 percentage points), 40 (78%) achieved a decrease in complications (range -8.5 percentage points to +2.9 percentage points), 26 (51%) achieved a decrease in serious complications (range -3.2 percentage points to +3.0 percentage points), 29 (57%) achieved a decrease in ED visits (range 5.0 percentage points to +2.2 percentage points), 46 (90%) achieved a decrease in readmissions (range -3.1 percentage points to +0.4 percentage points) and 39 (76%) achieved a decrease in reoperations (range 3.3 percentage points to +1.0 percentage points). Conclusions: Despite overall improvement in surgical outcomes across hospitals participating in a quality improvement collaborative, there was substantial variation in improvement between hospitals, highlighting opportunities to better understand hospital-level barriers and facilitators to surgical quality improvement.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小西完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
纯真保温杯完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
林宥嘉完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Joseph_LIN完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
hou完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
短巷完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
luckkit完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Much完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
倪小呆完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
Singularity应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
美好乐松应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
36456657应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
Loooong应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
美好乐松应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
LZQ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
Loooong应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
36456657应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
明天更好完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
LZQ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
美好乐松应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
LZQ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
Loooong应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
美好乐松应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
默默地读文献应助李剑鸿采纳,获得10
19秒前
不吃芹菜完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
赵坤煊完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
MM完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
fls221完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
tyt完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
畅快山兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
43秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
Distinct Aggregation Behaviors and Rheological Responses of Two Terminally Functionalized Polyisoprenes with Different Quadruple Hydrogen Bonding Motifs 450
Ciprofol versus propofol for adult sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3671358
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3228175
关于积分的说明 9778776
捐赠科研通 2938469
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1610028
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 760503
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 736020