Comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in reducing psychological symptoms among patients with chronic low back pain

医学 心理干预 物理疗法 慢性疼痛 替代医学 重症监护医学 精神科 病理
作者
Lu-Ping Zhou,Ren‐Jie Zhang,Jin Shang,Liang Kang,Zhigang Zhang,Bo Zhang,Jiaqi Wang,Chong-Yu Jia,Chen-Hao Zhao,H. Zhang,Xianliang Zhang,Cailiang Shen
出处
期刊:International Journal of Surgery [Wolters Kluwer]
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1097/js9.0000000000000798
摘要

Objectives: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) can seriously impair the quality of life of patients and has a remarkable comorbidity with psychological symptoms, which, in turn, can further exacerbate the symptoms of CLBP. Psychological treatments are critical and nonnegligent for the management of CLBP, and thus, should attract sufficient attention. However, current evidence does not suggest the superiority and effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing psychological symptoms among patients with CLBP. Thus, this study was designed to compare the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for depression, anxiety, and mental health among patients with CLBP and to recommend preferred strategies for attenuating psychological symptoms in clinical practice. Methods: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), PubMed, Embase Database, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception until March 2022. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compare different non-pharmacological interventions for depression, anxiety, and mental health among patients with CLBP were eligible. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement was used. Four reviewers in pairs and divided into two groups independently performed literature selection, data extraction, and risk of bias and certainty of evidence assessments. This NMA was conducted with a random effects model under a frequentist framework. The major outcomes were depression, anxiety, and mental health presented as the standardized mean difference (SMD) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: A total of 66 RCTs that randomized 4806 patients with CLBP met the inclusion criteria. The quality of evidence was typically low or some risks of bias (47 out of 66 trials, 71.3%), and the precision of summary estimates for effectiveness varied substantially. In addition, 7 categories of interventions with 26 specific treatments were evaluated. For depression, mind body therapy (pooled SMD = −1.20, 95% CI: −1.63 to −0.78), biopsychosocial approach (pooled SMD = −0.41, 95% CI: −0.70 to −0.12), and physical therapy (pooled SMD = −0.26, 95% CI: −0.50 to −0.02) exhibited remarkable effectiveness in reducing depression compared with the control group. For managing anxiety, mind body therapy (pooled SMD = −1.35, 95% CI: −1.90 to −0.80), multicomponent intervention (pooled SMD = −0.47, 95% CI: −0.88 to −0.06), and biopsychosocial approach (pooled SMD = −0.46, 95% CI: −0.79 to −0.14) were substantially superior to the control group. For improving mental health, multicomponent intervention (pooled SMD = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.14 to 1.39), exercise (pooled SMD = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.08 to 1.11), and physical therapy (pooled SMD = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.92) demonstrated statistically substantial effectiveness compared with the control group. The rank probability indicated that mind body therapy achieved the highest effectiveness in reducing depression and anxiety among patients with CLBP. Besides, the combined results should be interpreted cautiously based on the results of analyses evaluating the inconsistency and certainty of the evidence. Conclusion: This systemic review and NMA suggested that non-pharmacological interventions show promise for reducing psychological symptoms among patients with CLBP. In particular, mind body therapy and biopsychosocial approach show considerable promise, and mind body therapy can be considered a priority choice in reducing depression and anxiety. These findings can aid clinicians in assessing the potential risks and benefits of available treatments for CLBP comorbidity with psychological symptoms and provide evidence for selecting interventions in clinical practice. More RCTs involving different interventions with rigorous methodology and adequate sample size should be conducted in future research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
amberzyc应助小远采纳,获得10
1秒前
qiongqiong完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
淡定的依瑶完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
江璃发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
美丽的安珊完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
10秒前
Gilana完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
xyh发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
江璃完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
TT发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
美梦成真完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Gakay完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
szj完成签到,获得积分0
14秒前
旦皋完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
赘婿应助花壳在逃野猪采纳,获得10
15秒前
卷卷完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
JSY完成签到 ,获得积分20
17秒前
xyh完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
小曾应助Florencia采纳,获得10
19秒前
神外王001完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
24秒前
你是谁完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
majf完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
linhanwenzhou完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
JSY关注了科研通微信公众号
26秒前
853225598完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
798完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
善学以致用应助董怼怼采纳,获得10
27秒前
妍儿完成签到,获得积分20
28秒前
隐形曼青应助高大的水壶采纳,获得10
28秒前
马哥二弟无敌完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
30秒前
Florencia完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
务实颜完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
30秒前
amberzyc应助小远采纳,获得10
31秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038368
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3576068
关于积分的说明 11374313
捐赠科研通 3305780
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819322
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892672
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815029