Endoluminal Ultrasonography versus Computed Tomography for Locoregional Staging of Carcinoma Stomach.

Curative surgery remains the mainstay treatment of carcinoma stomach till to date. Preoperative accurate diagnosis of the depth of tumour invasion (T) and nodal involvement (N) in stomach cancer is important in determining the choice of an optimal therapeutic approach. Endoluminal ultrasonography (EUS) is considered as most reliable tools for assessing locoregional staging as it can overcome bones and air barrier on the other hand computed tomography (CT) has increased its' efficacy greatly after introduction of extreme multi-detector and phase-contrast CT. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of T and N staging with EUS and CT by comparing with postoperative histopathology in stomach carcinoma. This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the department of General Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh from August 2019 to July 2020. Forty five (45) patients who underwent curative stomach resection surgery due to carcinoma of stomach were enrolled in this study. All patients were investigated by EUS and CT preoperatively to assess locoregional staging. Then patients underwent stomach resection surgery and specimen sent for histopathology. EUS had sensitivity 80.0% to predict T staging but specificity 60.0% and the overall accuracy was 68.89%. CT result showed sensitivity 59.38% to predict T staging but specificity 46.15%, and the overall accuracy was 55.56%. EUS had 65.63% sensitivity to predict nodal involvement but specificity 61.54% and the overall accuracy was 64.44%. CT had 83.33% sensitivity to predict nodal involvement but specificity 55.56% and the overall accuracy was 77.78%. EUS is more accurate than CT in T staging but CT is more accurate than EUS in the N staging of carcinoma stomach. So EUS and CT both should be used as a diagnostic tool for preoperative locoregional staging of carcinoma stomach.