医学
系统回顾
数据提取
梅德林
混淆
批判性评价
质量(理念)
可靠性(半导体)
选择偏差
医学物理学
替代医学
病理
哲学
功率(物理)
物理
法学
认识论
量子力学
政治学
作者
Jill A. Hayden,Pierre Côté,Claire Bombardier
标识
DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00010
摘要
Quality appraisal, a necessary step in systematic reviews, is incomplete in most reviews of prognosis studies. Adequate quality assessment should include judgments about 6 areas of potential study biases. Authors should incorporate these quality assessments into their synthesis of evidence about prognosis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI