血液学
造血
自然史
内科学
医学
肿瘤科
生物
干细胞
遗传学
作者
Shyam A. Patel,William K Gerber,Rena Zheng,Shrinkhala Khanna,Lloyd Hutchinson,Gregory A. Abel,Jan Černý,Brandon A. DaSilva,Tian Yi Zhang,Muthalagu Ramanathan,Salwa Khedr,William Selove,Bruce A. Woda,Patricia M. Miron,Anne W. Higgins,Jonathan M. Gerber
摘要
Summary Recursive partitioning of healthy consortia led to the development of the Clonal Hematopoiesis Risk Score (CHRS) for clonal haematopoiesis (CH); however, in the practical setting, most cases of CH are diagnosed after patients present with cytopenias or related symptoms. To address this real‐world population, we characterize the clinical trajectories of 94 patients with CH and distinguish CH harbouring canonical DNMT3A/TET2/ASXL1 mutations alone (‘sole DTA’) versus all other groups (‘non‐sole DTA’). TET2 , rather than DNMT3A , was the most prevalent mutation in the real‐world setting. Sole DTA patients did not progress to myeloid neoplasm (MN) in the absence of acquisition of other mutations. Contrastingly, 14 (20.1%) of 67 non‐sole DTA patients progressed to MN. CHRS assessment showed a higher frequency of high‐risk CH in non‐sole DTA (vs. sole DTA) patients and in progressors (vs. non‐progressors). RUNX1 mutation conferred the strongest risk for progression to MN (odds ratio [OR] 10.27, 95% CI 2.00–52.69, p = 0.0053). The mean variant allele frequency across all genes was higher in progressors than in non‐progressors (36.9% ± 4.62% vs. 24.1% ± 1.67%, p = 0.0064). This analysis in the post‐CHRS era underscores the natural history of CH, providing insight into patterns of progression to MN.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI