作者
Lingzhi Li,Ming-Feng Lu,Lilian Zhao,Zhaoxiong Shen,Lilei He,Jisi Xing,Changbing Wang
摘要
PurposeTo investigate the efficacy of all-arthroscopic glenoid bone augmentation surgery using the iliac crest autograft procedure. Furthermore, we sought to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using screw versus button fixation, in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability.MethodsBetween 2015 and 2019, 134 shoulders with persistent instability were surgically treated with an arthroscopically placed autologous iliac crest bone graft transfer procedure. Preoperative and postoperative clinical follow-up data were evaluated using the range of motion, and the Walch-Duplay, American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES), and Rowe scores. Radiological assessment on three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans was performed preoperatively, immediately after surgery, as well as postoperatively, at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and at the final follow-up stage. Graft positions, healing, and resorption were evaluated from postoperative images.ResultsThis study included 102 patients who underwent arthroscopic iliac crest bone grafting procedure with two screws fixation (n = 37; group 1) and two button fixation (n =65; group 2). The mean follow-up period was 37 months. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of clinical scores, shoulder motion range, graft healing, or graft positions on CT scans (P>0.05). In group 1, one patient showed mechanical irritation and persistent pain around the screw insertion site, being treated through the arthroscopic removal of the screws. The average postoperative bony resorption percentages were 20.3% and 11.2% at 6 months, and 32.4% and 19.3% at 12 months, in group 1 and group 2, respectively. A statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups (P<0.05).ConclusionsIn the arthroscopic iliac crest bone grafting procedure for the treatment of chronic osseous anterior shoulder instability, excellent functional results were obtained after both button and screw fixation techniques. Moreover, suture button fixation resulted in less graft resorption and the lack of hardware-related complications.