观察研究
因果推理
随机对照试验
反事实思维
随机试验
计算机科学
心理学观察方法
推论
表(数据库)
数据科学
心理学
人工智能
医学
数据挖掘
计量经济学
社会心理学
数学
外科
病理
作者
Miguel A. Hernán,James M. Robins
摘要
Ideally, questions about comparative effectiveness or safety would be answered using an appropriately designed and conducted randomized experiment. When we cannot conduct a randomized experiment, we analyze observational data. Causal inference from large observational databases (big data) can be viewed as an attempt to emulate a randomized experiment—the target experiment or target trial—that would answer the question of interest. When the goal is to guide decisions among several strategies, causal analyses of observational data need to be evaluated with respect to how well they emulate a particular target trial. We outline a framework for comparative effectiveness research using big data that makes the target trial explicit. This framework channels counterfactual theory for comparing the effects of sustained treatment strategies, organizes analytic approaches, provides a structured process for the criticism of observational studies, and helps avoid common methodologic pitfalls.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI